
Forum Posts: 4 | Comment #1 by Barozi Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 02:56:31 PM | |
| They shouldn't have taken the Brothers in Arms title for this game. |
|

Forum Posts: 56 | Comment #2 by SmS Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 02:56:48 PM | |
| Thank You! Another game series screwed. Hell's Highway was one of the best shooters, i waited for next epic game and everything i get is this? |
|

Forum Posts: 17 | Comment #3 by PhoenixTemplar Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 02:57:27 PM | |
| Here come the "Waahhh, it shouldn't be called BiA"comments. And while I agree with that, it unfortunately is called that...so let's get over it already. This games looks like a lot of fun, and I play my games to have a good time. So bring it on. |
|

Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #4 by 232323jvc Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 02:57:45 PM | |
| I dont know why people tend to be aggressive to new and different ideas :/ |
|

Forum Posts: 7 | Comment #5 by kristijan0590 Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 03:01:57 PM | |
| #4 it's not the idea, but the name. It can be named Furious 4 but not BiA Furious 4. |
|

Forum Posts: 17 | Comment #6 by PhoenixTemplar Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 03:05:59 PM | |
| @5 - That's why I said I agree. I don't like it either. I wish it was just Furious 4, but it's not. And as much as I dislike it, I really dislike all the bitching about it. |
|

Forum Posts: 6004 | Comment #7 by Opiate42 Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 03:07:36 PM | |
| Looks like a Heavy with a new hat. |
|

Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #8 by 232323jvc Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 03:08:37 PM | |
#5 mmm you have a point, it could`ve been a different name, so I guess the question we all want to find about is why did they named the game after a totally different franchise? :o |
|

Forum Posts: 21 | Comment #9 by Rockox Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 03:09:18 PM | |
| I'd rather see Gearbox pimping the new Aliens game, to be perfectly honest. |
|

Forum Posts: 61 | Comment #10 by Jeroenman Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 03:10:48 PM | |
| im glad that they are trying to do something new and i dont care that theyre using the BIA name |
|

Forum Posts: 11 | Comment #11 by dark quasar Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 03:14:35 PM | |
| i think they called it BiA so they could put natiz in it |
|

Forum Posts: 14187 | Comment #12 by B A R 4 D Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 03:15:48 PM | |
| WWII is where its at! This looks damn sweet! |
|

Forum Posts: 52 | Comment #13 by Halochief Chris Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 03:21:34 PM | |
| The core of the "Brothers in Arms" game play was the ability to set your soldiers somewhere, give them a specific objective like suppression or flanking, and watch as you eliminate enemies with no casualties, as well as the repercussions of sending soldiers somewhere and accidentally running a fire team into a tank, killing the squad. BiA seems to only be a title indicative of WWII now if they do intend to use the name for this game. If they just called it "Furious 4" no one would totally know when it was set if you didn't see game play but the "Brothers in Arms" tag tells you it is a WWII game. Unless they intend to do something to intertwine the stories, which a number of people like myself would dislike, they should drop the BiA tag from the title and use a new name. It could turn out to be fun nonsense, but it seems like they figured "It worked once, let's see if we can make some money now." It seems like a very risky gamble that's only appeal is it's WWII and you can do crazy shit that never happened. But it's not even like Inglorious Basterds in that respect, Inglorious Basterds was intended to be funny WWII nonsense but this is just jumping on the bandwagon of games like Borderlands. I'm not gonna just straight buy this after release, I'll probably wait for some reviews and maybe rent it. But it doesn't seem a surefire buy like the other games in the series. |
|

Forum Posts: 3 | Comment #14 by SD wr3tch Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 03:21:35 PM | |
| They should have named it Wolfenstein. |
|

Forum Posts: 198 | Comment #15 by The Betrayer142 Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 03:26:24 PM | |
| I think people need to QQ about the whole BIA title thing because it's a new game and it's the developers choice, so just enjoy the game for what it is. A title only goes skin-deep, unless some stuck-up snobs will choose to not buy a game because of its title, which I highly doubt, even among the most pretentious of gamers. |
|

Forum Posts: 181 | Comment #16 by Lothra Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 03:34:06 PM | |
They still need to drop the BIA from the title, just call if Furious 4, when i think of BIA i think of Baker, Red, Leggit, Courtland, the emotional story etc, i don't think of some TF2/Inglourious Basterds/Left 4 Dead/Borderlands hybrid. Ill rent this (or not). |
|

Forum Posts: 141 | Comment #17 by Goldyman77 Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 03:43:43 PM | |
| Well this is absolutely absurd and nowhere near being worth 60 dollars in my mind. At best this is a rent. Really disappointed with this since the series was very good and original. :( |
|

Forum Posts: 546 | Comment #18 by pauly_27 Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 03:47:59 PM | |
The thing is though, why even tie in a over the top, arcade shooter to the Brothers In Arms brand? Reeks of desrperation if you ask me. Are they that unconfident the game wouldn't sell without having the moniker of an established series slapped onto it? And no, I'm not bothered about the name. It just seems irrelevant to the actual game itself. And yeah, WW2 has been done to death, even slapping "whacky" weapons on it has been done to death as well. |
|

Forum Posts: 3 | Comment #19 by AwsmGuitar Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 03:49:14 PM | |
| maan earned in blood was so awesome on the xbox, lets see how this one comes , i dont know if this type of comic take on ww2 works very well but i'll wait |
|

Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #20 by JakeyIncarnate Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 03:55:01 PM | |
| Shut the hell up and enjoy the game. |
|

Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #21 by WMDalpha Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 04:01:59 PM | |
| This looks awesome and everyone needs to stop freaking out about this. I bet the next Brother in Arms game will take it back to its roots. So this game will be very fun |
|

Forum Posts: 26 | Comment #23 by Static Parsley Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 04:27:35 PM | |
Looks fun... as for the use of the Name Bothers in Arms... Get over it! Its just a damn name, the developers wanted to use it, let them. People are crying over a name...really? like I said Get over it...Its just a name, its just a game. there are better things to be getting upset over. and I for one am happy to see another WWII game, so sick and tired of seeing Modern Warfare every year. |
|

Forum Posts: 34 | Comment #24 by DirtySeb Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 04:50:18 PM | |
@ 1 & 2 I completely agree, such a waste... @23 Get over using 'get over it' and then get over it |
|

Forum Posts: 78 | Comment #25 by JxOxHxNxSxOxN Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 05:08:10 PM | |
| I love how every comment that says "Looks fun" has negative votes. What? Are people not allowed to say "Oh, this game might be fun!" if you don't agree? I guess not. I'm gonna join them and say that this game actually looks like it's gonna be some fun, BiA or not. Go ahead, bring on the negative votes, trolls. |
|

Forum Posts: 181 | Comment #26 by Dildar Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 05:19:35 PM | |
| I am massively disappointed hearing this news, I really enjoy the BIA series. Now we have this "distraction", we'll never get the proper sequel we deserve. |
|

Forum Posts: 5 | Comment #27 by dante956 Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 05:36:20 PM | |
| I was at the Gearbox community day and saw a live demo of the game. It looked really fun and off the wall crazy. I am really looking forward to this game. They also said they are not finished with the Matt Baker story and there will be another BIA. |
|

Forum Posts: 1012 | Comment #28 by Magicman10893 Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 06:25:35 PM | |
| Why even call it "Brothers In Arms"? I know it's just a name, but it makes no sense. It would be like a new Star Wars movie coming out that makes no mention of any of the characters, the Jedi, the Sith, the Force, Lighstabers, Stormtroopers and rather than being a science fiction action drama it was a science fiction children's educational show that just happened to mention the name of a planet that sounds remotely similar to an obscure planet that was mentioned once in the entire Star Wars expanded universe. |
|

Forum Posts: 26 | Comment #29 by Swegabe Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 06:57:00 PM | |
| I think this can be summoned up as "Err, what the...?" |
|

Forum Posts: 475 | Comment #30 by BackerMan Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 07:55:45 PM | |
| please take off brothers in arms... |
|

Forum Posts: 104 | Comment #31 by Battletick Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 08:50:33 PM | |
"It wouldn’t be a WWII video game without a chainsaw, right? Wait… what!?" What the hell is this? I love WWII games, and thought a new one would be really cool, but this is just stupid. @23 Me too, but this is more like a WWII version of Bulletstorm. (I might as well mention I'm not a fan of Bulletstorm) |
|

Forum Posts: 8 | Comment #32 by jonstud Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 09:08:41 PM | |
| hope its a bit smoother than the last one |
|

Forum Posts: 977 | Comment #33 by Zombiedrd Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 09:37:47 PM | |
| The fuck kind of game is this |
|

Forum Posts: 8 | Comment #34 by TrappedInTime Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 09:49:20 PM | |
| Cmon its Ubisoft you should have seen this coming. The only franchise they havent ruined is Assassins Creed. |
|

Forum Posts: 29 | Comment #35 by crunchb3rry Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 10:20:29 PM | |
| This is messed up. The other games were always so serious, with historic unlockables, scans of actual documents, clearly a lot of respect for the subject matter, etc. But what the hell is this crap? This is almost as bad as offensive as that godawful westernized main character in the failed Prince of Persia reboot. That's possibly the most obnoxious game character ever. |
|

Forum Posts: 2444 | Comment #36 by DENAz666 Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 10:21:22 PM | |
They should have just left it as Furious 4, adding the title BIA to this game is just an insult to the soldiers who fought in that squad. They game itself looks awesome, but they really should not have slapped on BIA to the game |
|

Forum Posts: 373 | Comment #37 by deluxnugs Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 10:21:48 PM | |
| @ most of you bitches who only like cod and battlefield.GO BACK TO THE GAMETRAILERS WEBSITE. |
|

Forum Posts: 9 | Comment #38 by JamMastrHibbert Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 10:30:14 PM | |
| Sounds pretty fun. I'm always ready to jump back into the story of Matt Baker and the other Screamin' Eagles |
|

Forum Posts: 2444 | Comment #39 by DENAz666 Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 10:39:25 PM | |
Get over it? BIA is not just a name, but about a squad of soliders who went through hell in the war. Slapping the name BIA on this game is an insult to those soldiers who pretty much all died while on that mission. Don't get me wrong, the game looks awesome, but they should have kept BIA out of the title, its just not right making fun of the sacrifice those soldiers made |
|

Forum Posts: 9 | Comment #40 by Boro Iz Rich Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 11:00:12 PM | |
@13 tl; dr lol OT: Never played a Brother in arms so I could care less what they call it. Probably won't be getting it anyway. We'll see... |
|

Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #41 by sonicdevron Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 11:27:46 PM | |
| Sort of rings a bell to what Battlefield did with Bad Company, no? |
|

Forum Posts: 2444 | Comment #42 by DENAz666 Wednesday, June 15, 2011 @ 12:56:44 AM | |
| @41, but was battlefield based on a true story? |
|

Forum Posts: 450 | Comment #43 by stevedb79 Wednesday, June 15, 2011 @ 02:03:24 AM | |
| They better not cock up this franchise.....Duke Nukem anyone? |
|

Forum Posts: 174 | Comment #44 by Mahatma Andhi Wednesday, June 15, 2011 @ 02:38:23 AM | |
Brand names sell games. If they made an aeroplane game and called it 'Call of Duty: Dogfight' it'll probably outsell Ace Combat, Hawx or any other similar titles. These people aren't your friends, they want your money. By strapping a well established series name to this game they're able to increase sales by a significant figure. |
|

Forum Posts: 17 | Comment #45 by PhoenixTemplar Wednesday, June 15, 2011 @ 02:41:58 AM | |
| @38 - I take it you didn't actually read the article. |
|

Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #46 by asilent boom Wednesday, June 15, 2011 @ 02:43:42 AM | |
| Please allow me to fire my weapon from the hip in this game. I hated always having to aim down the sites when someone was 5 feet in front of me. |
|

Forum Posts: 5 | Comment #47 by Banedain Wednesday, June 15, 2011 @ 03:47:38 AM | |
people are talking about how this is an insult to world war 2 but wolfenstein isnt? I didnt hear any unethical controversy when they made a game about killing zombie mutant nazis with ray guns in another dimension as bubble boy on the other hand B in A is apparently(ive never played one) a serious game this argument looks like it could go either way but look at #44 hes got the reasonin for the company correct. I think its ok as long as they make up the characters and dont use historical names for any of the allied soldiers. and even most of the nazis |
|

Forum Posts: 546 | Comment #48 by pauly_27 Wednesday, June 15, 2011 @ 08:25:40 AM | |
@ #47 Wolfenstein took the nazi interest into the occult and spun a fictional tale from it. Almost a "what if" scenario based on literature and fantasy. Brothers in Arms uses real campaigns that happened in WW2, and prides itself on trying to create the actual areas using maps and photos taken from the time. That's why I can understand some people's objection to it, even if I don't agree. My argument remains that it just seems totally pointless to have the Brothers in Arms moniker in the first place. It just serves to annoy the BIA fans, whilst serving no point in building a potential new franchise instead. |
|

Forum Posts: 75 | Comment #49 by chizrocker88 Wednesday, June 15, 2011 @ 03:51:40 PM | |
| Am I the only one who views this as a Brothers In Arms' "Bad Company"? I don't think this will be game of the year by any means, but it looks like it could be fun. They've already said they're going to go back to the normal style for the next one so no need to flip out over it. |
|

Forum Posts: 5 | Comment #50 by dante956 Wednesday, June 15, 2011 @ 05:27:50 PM | |
| At the gearbox event this past weekend they said that this game came from all the tall tales they heard from the WW2 vets they interviewed for BIA. It looks amazing and it is my most anticipated game so far for next year. |
|

Forum Posts: 2444 | Comment #51 by DENAz666 Thursday, June 16, 2011 @ 12:25:54 AM | |
| @47 Wolfenstein wasn't based on a true story. Big difference |
|

Forum Posts: 104 | Comment #52 by Battletick Thursday, June 16, 2011 @ 12:57:52 AM | |
| @47 I almost did mention it in my post, but I wanted to stay on subject for once. |
|

Forum Posts: 270 | Comment #53 by Pakhair Saturday, July 02, 2011 @ 04:35:34 PM | |
I'm liking it so far. Well I know people are angry on BIA name but spin-offs were a major thing in last gen, I guess the people are forgetting that. It doesn't makes a difference to me, It's mostly done to cash on a game series e.g Resident Evil Gun Survivor, Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles: The Crystal Bearers, Mortal Kombat Shaolin Monks e.t.c |
|

Forum Posts: 125 | Comment #54 by Broke Friday, January 06, 2012 @ 01:38:10 AM | |
| They already ruined the franchise with Hells Highway, Road To Hill 30 And Earned In Blood Were two of the best multiplayer games of all time they required genine skill and tactical awareness! They ditched all of that for Hells Highway trying to turn it into another Call of Duty and it failed massively, i was hoping they would learn from their mistakes but obviously not reading this has really dissapointed me! |
|