Forum Posts: 169 | Comment #1 by Arron114 Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:15:01 PM | |
| What about the "Horrendous Mistake" he made, that was fable 3? |
|
Forum Posts: 138 | Comment #2 by TimJimRob Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:15:13 PM | |
| It's a mystery..... spooky |
|
Forum Posts: 1 | Comment #3 by A Mc Jaguar Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:17:06 PM | |
| Sorry, but I will never buy another Fable game. The first one is the only one I've kept. |
|
Forum Posts: 289 | Comment #4 by Stevilinho Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:20:47 PM | |
Conversely, journalists witnessing the behind closed doors demo of the game this week say no, it actually is on-rails. So who's telling the truth? We'll set the record straight with our preview soon.
i would say journos are because we all know peter chats aload of bollocks harsh but true |
|
Forum Posts: 18 | Comment #5 by Smithman117 Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:21:14 PM | |
| Didn't he lie about features that were going to be in Fable 3 but didn't? |
|
Forum Posts: 89 | Comment #6 by strawberry Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:21:32 PM | |
| Molyneux should never be trusted with what he says about his own games, no offense to him as a game maker, the fable series is quite good, however he makes them out to be way better than they are. |
|
Forum Posts: 2522 | Comment #7 by jamie1000013 Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:21:47 PM | |
*Game comes out*
"Ha! told you it wasn't on-rails because it's on-horse..." Peter Molyneux. |
|
Forum Posts: 560 | Comment #8 by MakoBallistic Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:25:43 PM | |
| After Fable 3 Lionhead can shove it all up their rectum, as thats where i assume it cam from originally anyway. |
|
Forum Posts: 173 | Comment #9 by Epilogue of Euphoria Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:26:05 PM | |
@ 1
I thought is was Fable 2. |
|
Forum Posts: 29 | Comment #10 by Godfather93a Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:27:44 PM | |
@#1 So true Fable3 sucked, worst of the series. They totally killed the joy
of interacting with towns folk, also it didn't even feel like an RPG anymore. |
|
Forum Posts: 14 | Comment #11 by NIMRODofArnor Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:28:11 PM | |
| @1 Dude there is no way Fable 3 is a bad game, personally It was my favorite one. Now Fable 2 on the other hand pissed me off when it first came out. But now that they fixed a lot of the bugs it is much better. |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #12 by acanofcoke69 Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:28:37 PM | |
whats on-rails mean
|
|
Forum Posts: 79 | Comment #13 by Whiistler Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:28:43 PM | |
| Considering the liar he is, I don't believe him. |
|
Forum Posts: 5889 | Comment #14 by Opiate42 Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:28:50 PM | |
| Ah Molyneux....are we surprised? |
|
Forum Posts: 169 | Comment #15 by Arron114 Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:28:52 PM | |
| @2 We can learn to accept shoddy sequals. once bitten twice shy? |
|
Forum Posts: 169 | Comment #16 by Arron114 Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:29:52 PM | |
| @14, sorry. |
|
Forum Posts: 444 | Comment #18 by sak7395 Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:30:51 PM | |
stop hating on fable
fallout sucks
see I can be a hater |
|
Forum Posts: 169 | Comment #19 by Arron114 Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:30:52 PM | |
| @11 even, Haha ohh nights in. |
|
Forum Posts: 460 | Comment #20 by GDMFS0AB Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:40:06 PM | |
Molyneux is a liar. He bullshits at E3 all the time. Oooh Fable has this, Fable as that. Then when it is released and it has nothing of what he has said.
He talks shit. FACT |
|
Forum Posts: 199 | Comment #21 by ViNyLek Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:40:16 PM | |
| At least his accent is funny:-) |
|
Forum Posts: 12 | Comment #22 by OllyKiriyama Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:47:15 PM | |
Molyneux does BS. I only ever liked Fable 1, the rest sucked.
I can't to see how he hypes The Journey up only to have it be another disappointment. |
|
Forum Posts: 2336 | Comment #23 by KNIGHTOFSERA Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:50:35 PM | |
| @22 so right Fable I was best of the series....II and especially III were not even the same......they focus on "improving" the wrong things each time |
|
Forum Posts: 183 | Comment #24 by Lothra Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:56:22 PM | |
The Fable franchise is pretty much dead anyway, mistakes or not, PM only has himself to blame for running this franchise into the dirt.
The only way they could bring this franchise back is if they make a real sequal to the first game, bring back the original hero, and for gods sake they need to deal with Theresa's story once and for all and stop having her as a background character. |
|
Forum Posts: 128 | Comment #25 by Fakan Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 04:59:18 PM | |
| I would've thought that was Fable 2, and anyway, isn't this the guy that said he makes stuff up just to get people interested in his games? |
|
Forum Posts: 744 | Comment #26 by Fire Mage Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 05:00:42 PM | |
The original Fable was great. Fable II was actually really good, I enjoyed it quite a lot although a lot of people didn't.
Fable III however... I'm just not feeling it. I like it and all, and I'll probably get all of the points for it. But it seems like such a step back from everything else.
They keep over-simplifying everything with each new game (and funnily enough, if this new one is on-rails, then it's even simpler) and just dumb it down to it not being fun.
On the other hand, they made easy things complex and annoying, i.e. the stupid map of Fable III, and the Sanctuary, etc. The Sanctuary was cool at first, now it's stupid. I wish it was more of an option in a menu or something.
They need to return Fable back to its roots. I enjoy the idea of being king in the new game, but it's not quite what I expected at all. Not as large of a scale or as cool as it could have been.
Do better already, Lionhead. Stop getting crappier. |
|
Forum Posts: 14 | Comment #27 by EclipseofChaos Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 05:00:51 PM | |
| I'll say he made a mistake. He spoke. You'd think he'd have learned not to make that mistake anymore! |
|
Forum Posts: 169 | Comment #28 by Arron114 Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 05:01:58 PM | |
| @26 perfect. |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #29 by WMDalpha Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 05:03:37 PM | |
| I hate this guy! He lies to his customers about every game that comes out. What an ass |
|
Forum Posts: 6 | Comment #30 by Contender19 Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 05:08:59 PM | |
| it's like the make this game for fucking retards who can't move their body |
|
Forum Posts: 29 | Comment #31 by Godfather93a Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 05:15:22 PM | |
I wish Lionhead would just give up on Fable & make a new Black&White.
That would be pretty bad ass to play on Kinect. |
|
Forum Posts: 1 | Comment #32 by JusZen Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 05:17:20 PM | |
Everybody posting here must be new to video games. Every game dev in history has touted a feature or two of their new game that never came to light. This is nothing new. Get over it.
If you don't like something, you don't have to verbally bash it everywhere you are given the chance. Just don't support that company. Why play Fable 3 when you didn't even like the second one? Just so you have something to bitch about? Play the games you like, don't play the ones you don't like, and grow up.
If you think he is lying, don't support his company. No need for personal attacks of character here. |
|
Forum Posts: 169 | Comment #33 by Arron114 Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 05:20:48 PM | |
@32 http://www.xbox360achievements.org/news/news-7832-Molyneux-Made-Up-Game-Features--To-Stop-Journalists-Going-To-Sleep-.html
go to bed kid. |
|
Forum Posts: 1 | Comment #34 by JusZen Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 05:21:28 PM | |
| And why the Hell does everyone want to play a sequel exactly like it's predecessor?? I want a brand new game with a 2 or 3 on the title! You'd be pissed if a movie sequel were the same as the first, so why not hold the same standards for games? If you like the first one so much, then play the first one and let everyone else move on. |
|
Forum Posts: 1 | Comment #35 by diziet Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 05:22:08 PM | |
| Given his track record post Bullfrog I think, for once, I'll believe the journos. :P Fable 2 was v. good, I've not actually played the first which is a tad amiss of me. Fable 3 annoyed the shit out of me but I still finished it. In fact I played it through plus side quests constantly primarily so I could get a higher trade in value for it. |
|
Forum Posts: 251 | Comment #36 by Fang Foom Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 05:25:52 PM | |
Why do people write off the entire Fable series because they didn't like Fable 3? One bad game (which wasnt even bad in my opinion) doesnt make the entire series shit.
Otherwise Halo (ODST anyone?) and many more would be in trouble! |
|
Forum Posts: 1 | Comment #37 by JusZen Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 05:27:22 PM | |
| @33 Thank you! You proved my point exactly! All devs do it. Nothing new. |
|
Forum Posts: 169 | Comment #38 by Arron114 Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 05:32:09 PM | |
| @37 Dear god youre thick, the link is Molyneux on fable 3. |
|
Forum Posts: 178 | Comment #39 by PuttyGod Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 05:53:58 PM | |
| Hahahah, well, if the people who played the demo are saying it is on-rails, that means it is. Hell, if some mile high crackhead who has never played a video game in his life said it was on-rails, I would believe him over Peter Molyneux. The dude is a stage 3 compulsive liar at best. |
|
Forum Posts: 204 | Comment #40 by Ceejus Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 06:16:34 PM | |
@32
You speak the truth IMO. It makes sense. |
|
Forum Posts: 104 | Comment #41 by Gilganomics Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 06:21:41 PM | |
@12
"On-rails" means that movement is pre-determined by the game, and your only responsible for other things like aiming, or shooting (think Pokemon Snap, or train cart sequences in GoW, DK Country, etc.).
OT: I didn't even know about this demonstration, I thought the demo was referring to the teaser trailer that came out a few days ago. |
|
Forum Posts: 185 | Comment #42 by DragonessAthena Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 06:50:37 PM | |
| I like the Fable series, but they keep getting weaker instead of stronger. The fact that this new one is Kinect only means I won't touch it. We don't all want to "be a controller". |
|
Forum Posts: 530 | Comment #43 by o D M C o Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 06:58:41 PM | |
| The horrendous mistake was that he got caught bullshitting again, every time he opens his gob share holders must shit themselves |
|
Forum Posts: 201 | Comment #44 by Hawkeye1691 Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 07:01:46 PM | |
| @39 - Win. |
|
Forum Posts: 1718 | Comment #45 by newbsicle Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 07:04:02 PM | |
| Between Fable 3 and Star Wars there's no reason for core gamers not to jump on the kinect bandwagon. *sarcasm* |
|
Forum Posts: 1 | Comment #46 by XxMayhemxX Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 07:08:31 PM | |
| I just bought a Kinect like 4 weeks ago.. played Kinect Adventures, and Yoostar 2 In the Movies. They were fun for about an hour... i havent played my Kinect since... Fable Kinect.. I'll pass... I agree with #42.. I don't want to be the controller... Unless my movements mirror the onscreen character throughout the entire game.. say a 3rd person action game, or maybe a shooter... tho aiming would be tough.. otherwise.. Kinect, to me, is just a novelty like Wii(After an hour or 2 i was bored and done with it also) Quit focusing on the retarded Kinect, and get some new game IP's... |
|
Forum Posts: 17 | Comment #47 by PhoenixTemplar Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 07:16:29 PM | |
| Does this matter, in the whole "Is anyone actually going to buy this piece of shit game anyways"? |
|
Forum Posts: 46 | Comment #48 by xtkbilly Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 07:27:55 PM | |
| I'll tell you what his horrendous mistake was: Making three different games and putting them in the same series. |
|
Forum Posts: 101 | Comment #49 by Lord Simmons Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 07:37:38 PM | |
| From what I understand after watching hours and hours of E3 coverage, the truth is somewhere in the middle. You do spend a lot of time on the horse cart, but you can leave the cart and fight enemies and such. However, if I understood this right, you can't go very far away from the cart on the sequences that let you. Basically on the occasions where you can leave the cart, you're tied to a certain area. Yeah, terrible. Peter Molyneux is incredibly overrated. At their core the Fable series is pretty good, but then Molyneux adds worthless stuff like the Touch feature in Fable 3 and now this horse thing. The games are just getting worse and worse. And really Fable 2 wasn't all that great anyway. |
|
Forum Posts: 163 | Comment #50 by Predalien90 Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 07:45:28 PM | |
| I say that Petey's idea of "not on rails" means that everyone once in a while you come to a fork in the road and can choose which path to take. In his words this is "fully formed world exploration". |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #51 by Sean1234 Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 07:47:00 PM | |
| I loved the first one. I liked the second one. I hated the third one. I'm sure I'll hate this as much as I hate Kinect. It's just not for me. |
|
Forum Posts: 106 | Comment #52 by bawrash Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 07:56:58 PM | |
| The guys a persistent liar and I wouldn't even believe him if he told me duke nukem was actually released lol |
|
Forum Posts: 394 | Comment #53 by grumpiercloud Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 08:05:18 PM | |
| I liked fable 3 better than fable 2 simply because fable 2 seemed a lot shorter and I was sad that you couldn't really use bows and arrows anymore (except crossbows I think) |
|
Forum Posts: 22 | Comment #54 by sumthingchronic Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 08:19:46 PM | |
| I beleive the journalists on this at the moment, sick of the shit that comes out of Monlyneux mouth, always over-hypes |
|
Forum Posts: 12 | Comment #55 by caggzi86 Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 08:35:51 PM | |
@#32 a forum is a place to EXPRESS you opinion so if we want to bad mouth this jackass and his shit games we will.if we like the games and the devs we EXPRESS as well dont like it the dont read it.
|
|
Forum Posts: 620 | Comment #56 by Riphade 1 Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 08:43:05 PM | |
| Every time he opens his mouth, a horrendous mistake is made. |
|
Forum Posts: 76 | Comment #57 by cazx27 Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 09:06:51 PM | |
| good think i ve given up on any project this arsehole is envolved with anyway |
|
Forum Posts: 175 | Comment #58 by i Eat Kittenzx Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 09:12:23 PM | |
| Am i the only one who seems to actually enjoy the Fable series? |
|
Forum Posts: 225 | Comment #59 by Vault Lad Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 09:20:20 PM | |
There's a lot of hate in here for Fable...
I'm not going to argue with you, it deserves most of it. The games are fine, great even. But they are factually not what they are purported as being.
That said, This is the man who made Dungeon Keeper. I know it's a cliche but still, he was good at his job once. If there's even the slight possibility that every game he makes is closer to getting him back to that point then god-dammit, I'll still cross my fingers for this game being the one. Deluded as it sounds (as it is)I WANT this game to be good. We all should, because Peter Molyneux was awesome, once. |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #60 by chaosfinal Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 09:55:03 PM | |
sorry molineux you dont get more of my money..
i will pay to blockbuster for a rent nothing more nothing less...
|
|
Forum Posts: 1 | Comment #61 by PickVanCleef Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 10:23:11 PM | |
| #1 Yeah Fable 3 was an horrendous mistake.....so was Fable 2....the only good game was the original Fable.....all they are are sub-par fantsay RPGs with poor combat, graphics, depth and maturity. Molyneux builds his games up so much and they're always disappointing. Well not any more. This, and all other Fable games will be awful. |
|
Forum Posts: 16 | Comment #62 by callmeclean Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 10:37:22 PM | |
Wait the demo isn't hands on is it? I don't think so.. If I am right then I would much rather trust peter then a bunch of sweaty Journo's sitting well away from the screen and the person playing it. Sure he has said some things that are not true in the pas but I doubt he would outright lie like this, and also I doubt he would be stupid enough to ruin the series by making an on rail.
Fable 1 = Great, Fable 2 = Great, Fable 3 = Good. The things that made fable 3 not as good were not bad features, just different from what we were use to and maybe not as good. I am hoping this is good game, not hoping for a great since it is Kinect. |
|
Forum Posts: 951 | Comment #63 by Chaosflare Friday, June 10, 2011 @ 10:37:48 PM | |
| Not like he hasn't admitted to lying before. It's just that now we have to wait for another awards ceremony for him to admit this one. |
|
Forum Posts: 7 | Comment #64 by Drjimbo32 Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 12:25:09 AM | |
| We NEED more, and better xbox exclusives. The titles are slipping!!! |
|
Forum Posts: 4 | Comment #65 by jwindjackal Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 12:44:30 AM | |
| I respect each fable game for what it is, i think they are fun and entertaining and in the end that's what counts. |
|
Forum Posts: 22 | Comment #66 by XJeffryX Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 01:32:02 AM | |
| First he asks if people at some kind of convention want a Kinect Fable almost all say no so he says "They must have though they'd have to run in place to play" so he goes ahead and makes a Kinect Fable and now when everyone complains about hating how the Kinect Fable is on rails he probably had the whole thing changed from rails to free roam so expect the game to be half done upon release or for it to not come out for a long time. The first two fables were great games it's just lost all its spirit at this point and they're not caring and just making them for profit and not caring about their fan base. |
|
Forum Posts: 451 | Comment #67 by Mr Matty Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 01:40:17 AM | |
Lionhead is the first game studio to ever make games where they get worse rather than better.
fable 1 was brilliant Fable 2 was also
Fable 3 was ok but had way to many issues and so much cut out. |
|
Forum Posts: 57 | Comment #68 by Shikamaru FTW Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 01:57:05 AM | |
| How can open world game where the big draw is exploration be on rails |
|
Forum Posts: 332 | Comment #69 by Its Fooga Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 02:16:40 AM | |
Knowing the history of BS that Molyneux has spewed to sell his Fable games, I'll take the word of the journalists.
He's just a salesman trying to make more cash, nothing more. |
|
Forum Posts: 980 | Comment #70 by Devil Sora Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 02:35:58 AM | |
| I think Petey boy is lying. . . the guy loves to oversell his games to the point where gimmicks promised in the release were not the case at all. |
|
Forum Posts: 34 | Comment #71 by Coruba Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 05:23:56 AM | |
| Fable 1 awesome, 2 lame, 3 getting better, so I will likely buy this barring any earth shatterimg reviews calling it a lame dog ( or if its on rails! ) |
|
Forum Posts: 5 | Comment #72 by Adam Whitehead Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 05:57:57 AM | |
| I really didnt enjoy Fable 3. Molyneux is known for spouting rubbish, see what the reviews are like... |
|
Forum Posts: 238 | Comment #73 by PowercomSODMG Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 08:14:37 AM | |
| what is "on-rails"????? |
|
Forum Posts: 5 | Comment #74 by xdeathx2012 Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 09:39:17 AM | |
| Why even believe this guy any more FAble 1 was the best should have stopped there |
|
Forum Posts: 380 | Comment #75 by merzitar Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 09:51:50 AM | |
| He basically said that the full game won't be on rails, but the E3 version is. |
|
Forum Posts: 77 | Comment #76 by _Nosferatu_ Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 10:12:48 AM | |
| So what's new? |
|
Forum Posts: 1 | Comment #77 by TurnerVII Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 10:24:37 AM | |
| Ive liked all the fables. Just sayin |
|
Forum Posts: 218 | Comment #78 by the ferenczy Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 10:38:31 AM | |
| He lied? How shocking! He never lies! Especially not at E3 press conferences. |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #79 by Ultimo Godzilla Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 11:29:18 AM | |
| Fable 1 n 2 were the best. Fable 3 sucked ass and gave me homophobic vibes with the interactions. This Fable is a joke...."Oh, let's see the fall of Albion through a KINECT game." Screw this game. |
|
Forum Posts: 79 | Comment #80 by GeneralOnx Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 11:43:04 AM | |
| Just because 25 people sign there name doesn't mean the game is not on rails. IT DOESN'T PROVE ANYTHING! |
|
Forum Posts: 251 | Comment #81 by Fang Foom Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 11:43:39 AM | |
How about just giving us more Fable 3 DLC?
Fable 2 had some awesome stuff, but this one has had like one with achievements and one without!? |
|
Forum Posts: 175 | Comment #82 by Bullhorse Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 11:57:24 AM | |
| molyneux can't STOP lying about fable. of course it's on rails... |
|
Forum Posts: 63 | Comment #83 by Dlark17 Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 12:01:26 PM | |
| Well he already came out and said that he lies about his games. So why should we trust you now, Molyneux? |
|
Forum Posts: 7 | Comment #84 by Ultamisia Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 12:31:08 PM | |
| Dunno should i believe the person making the game? or some journalists that touched a section of the title? hhmmmm |
|
Forum Posts: 10 | Comment #85 by Xiong Gou Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 01:45:49 PM | |
| Don't even need to decide who to believe, the journalists all the way.... Peter lies and hypes everything..... |
|
Forum Posts: 2 | Comment #86 by Oxolus Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 02:35:29 PM | |
| Just bring out Fable:The Lost Chapters out for Xbox 360 with updated graphics and if your going to make a new game make it something like that |
|
Forum Posts: 1189 | Comment #87 by Ozbaab Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 02:57:25 PM | |
| Peter can go to hell for all I care. |
|
Forum Posts: 61 | Comment #88 by Frank_The_Bison Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 04:58:47 PM | |
| I liked the part where he explained how the character will move if not on rails. OH WAIT. |
|
Forum Posts: 830 | Comment #89 by J4ckyb0y1 Saturday, June 11, 2011 @ 11:28:15 PM | |
to Comment #6 by strawberry
He speaks about his game probably the same way your parents speak about you to others. |
|
Forum Posts: 29 | Comment #90 by crunchb3rry Sunday, June 12, 2011 @ 04:12:30 AM | |
| It could be on rails or not on rails, it's still going to be a progressively worse Fable game. Wish this guy would quit making games and just sell used cars. |
|
Forum Posts: 1525 | Comment #91 by Baihu1983 Sunday, June 12, 2011 @ 07:26:37 AM | |
| Whole series needs a good rest and a new engine. Needs to also stop being so damn easy! |
|
Forum Posts: 86 | Comment #92 by NerfTurbo Sunday, June 12, 2011 @ 08:26:45 AM | |
| I was wondering where all the Trolls went in Fable 3. It's good to see you're all okay. Remember to click the dislike button! |
|
Forum Posts: 33 | Comment #93 by StubbsDK Sunday, June 12, 2011 @ 08:43:26 AM | |
Really, Peter? Okay, it might not be "on-rail", but you can't disguise the fact that you are riding along a set path, not really getting to deviate from it, yeah, not a railshooter... It's a groundbreaking, trendsetting new thing! "CARRIAGESHOOTER"! .....no no no.... He should really learn to be quiet... Still remember the live interview with him, where the only comments to F:J was how sucky it looked, and the girl watching the twitterfeed had to come up with a question for him....sad....
Still, I must say, I enjoyed Fable 2 and 3, but the hype pissed me off, and Peter didn't deliver on most of his promises, and the ending to Fable 2 was just him taking a shit in your cereal....goddamnit, it sucked...
The fable series has a lot of promise, but someone should be hired to smack Peter with a stick when ever he promises to much, and give him a wedgie whenever he makes some stupid remarks about originality in his games...
But then again, we are talking about the man who thought that he could help RARE get a better image....jeebus.... |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #94 by Sean1234 Sunday, June 12, 2011 @ 11:17:41 AM | |
| @86 I think you're onto something there, but don't let the Molyneux hear that. It will fuck it up, bad. |
|
Forum Posts: 261 | Comment #95 by Pakhair Sunday, June 12, 2011 @ 12:55:37 PM | |
| Loved Fable 2, The 3rd one was broken, busted and buggy. Won't buy another Fable |
|
Forum Posts: 70 | Comment #96 by Ihazcandy4you Sunday, June 12, 2011 @ 01:46:50 PM | |
| Lost all faith in this dude. Ive enjoyed all 3 Fable games (ya even 3!!!) But they need to stop letting him talk.. |
|
Forum Posts: 940 | Comment #97 by Afro Ninja Sunday, June 12, 2011 @ 02:08:49 PM | |
@95, Just because ONE Fable sucked, you're not going to try any more?
What the hell is everyone's problem with Fable? Yeah Fable 3 wasn't as good as it's previous brothers but still, that doesn't mean you have to hate on the whole series. |
|
Forum Posts: 3 | Comment #98 by Isbjorn Sunday, June 12, 2011 @ 05:54:05 PM | |
| I really want the new fable but I don't want to get a damn kinect I don't have the space to play it. I think they should release 2 versions of games one with kinect playability and one where it isn't required needed or anything else. or make it like a bonus add on I hate games where they require you to have the kinect for the achievements and what not. :( |
|
Forum Posts: 61 | Comment #99 by Linguo TGR Sunday, June 12, 2011 @ 06:54:26 PM | |
So his 'horrendous mistake' was that he forgot to spread more lies?
Though to be fair, it is time for Fable to get on the Kinect, i mean the series clearly is trying to dumb itself down to appeal to the lowest common denominator, they may as well go all the way... |
|
Forum Posts: 2 | Comment #100 by Purge0fD1v1n1ty Sunday, June 12, 2011 @ 08:25:27 PM | |
All I really needed to read was post 1 and 3 couldn't put it any better myself.
.....and poor petey :/ |
|
Forum Posts: 40 | Comment #101 by aaroncurtis Sunday, June 12, 2011 @ 11:10:10 PM | |
| I hope this down sound too conspiracy theorist, but my bet is that, if anything, he's really announcing here a redirection for the development of the game, given the poor reaction to the idea of Fable on rails. It doesn't sound like a great idea to me, and I've enjoyed all of the Fable games so far. |
|
Forum Posts: 61 | Comment #102 by Frank_The_Bison Monday, June 13, 2011 @ 12:03:37 AM | |
@91
I agree 100%. The whole point of dying in a game is to set you back a hell of a lot. Not "Oh I lost a single guild seal, it's not like I have 999 of them..." I really wish that dying was a more punishing obstacle. Also bring back Mana so I can't just spam spells to win every damn fight. |
|
Forum Posts: 2 | Comment #103 by Mik29 Monday, June 13, 2011 @ 12:13:10 AM | |
| News just in, Peter Molyneux has been quoted as saying "I would have got away with it if it wasn't for you pesky journalists". lol |
|
Forum Posts: 50 | Comment #104 by RazielXaphan Monday, June 13, 2011 @ 12:48:16 AM | |
| I want to ask, would anyone REALLY care if this had been on "on the rails" game? I would personally like it, take me back to an almost "house of the dead" style game, but with fable elements. I would be happy with it. |
|
Forum Posts: 7 | Comment #105 by The Dow Monday, June 13, 2011 @ 03:28:48 AM | |
This guy is a one-man-hype-machine, give me Syndicate Wars 2 and i might forgive him.
|
|
Forum Posts: 5 | Comment #106 by Banedain Monday, June 13, 2011 @ 03:46:44 AM | |
Poor number 12 on rails game- a game that is completely linear and pretty much has no moving by yourself like old arcade shooters such as carn-evil
I smell a spin off dont go looking this way for fable 4 to redeem fable 3 it doesnt go on track to fable 1 an 2 in fact its perfecly off track (in an on track literally kind of way) |
|
Forum Posts: 85 | Comment #107 by Jraa7 Monday, June 13, 2011 @ 09:19:25 AM | |
| oh dude I love this game |
|
Forum Posts: 848 | Comment #108 by Flibbity Floid Monday, June 13, 2011 @ 12:46:47 PM | |
Molyneux is the equivalent to an E-Z Bake Oven. It looks great! It smells great! It seems so amazing!
Then when you finally open it, you have foil-wrapped shit that tastes good enough until you get an entirely different baked good. One that works. |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #109 by raptorsaurus Monday, June 13, 2011 @ 01:06:03 PM | |
| C'mon Peter, just make a game that lives up to the promises you made of the original Fable. It would probably be your best game ever. |
|
Forum Posts: 203 | Comment #110 by samjustsam Monday, June 13, 2011 @ 01:09:58 PM | |
| i agree that the fable games dont seem to get better but i still enjoyed all 3 of them so far. and yep fable 3 was a bit dissapointing but i was also kinda dissapointed in the second game cuse i thought it was too short. bottom line is i think that all 3 of them were enjoyable to play. |
|
Forum Posts: 15 | Comment #111 by Dark Pyro Tuesday, June 14, 2011 @ 05:10:18 PM | |
| fable 2 was my favorite fable then i got the first one it was good fable 3 seemed more like a arcade in between so does this i think with fable 3 they were doing stuff for it then heard about kinect droped fable 3 and started this either way just the gameplay looks on rails not realy a bad thing |
|
Forum Posts: 115 | Comment #112 by Mittens2317 Sunday, June 19, 2011 @ 12:59:10 PM | |
I like the simplicity of the Fable series. It's really refreshing in a time where developers like to over-complicate RPGs to make it feel complex and engrossing (Oblivion, anyone?)
The good thing is that the core gameplay always stays the same, but the little tweaks make it seem a lot more different, so you know you're not just playing the previous game with new textures and a new story. |
|
Forum Posts: 397 | Comment #113 by Tim1601 Tuesday, June 21, 2011 @ 10:12:34 AM | |
Anybody else's word > Molyneux
Me thinks. |
|
