Forum Posts: 308 | Comment #1 by Tribes V3X Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 04:13:32 PM | |
| hopefully MP is more balanced |
|
Forum Posts: 89 | Comment #2 by strawberry Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 04:16:01 PM | |
| @1 lets hope the entire game is more polished. The original just felt so rushed. |
|
Forum Posts: 181 | Comment #3 by Lothra Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 04:25:24 PM | |
Yay more Epic Fail on the way!
Seriously, EA need to put this franchise on the backburner for a few years, the originals became stale and boring, the reboot into modern era was just bad, they are trying too hard to compete with CoD but they need to go back to what made the first original games great and fun. |
|
Forum Posts: 215 | Comment #4 by Hilaryduffgta Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 04:25:39 PM | |
| what did people find wrong with the multiplayer? i actully enjoyed mp on the game a lot,i'll be messing around with my ps3 copy of it when i got a system set up but sweet a sequel,lets hope it doesnt turn out like modern warfare 2 |
|
Forum Posts: 311 | Comment #5 by gamerscorhunta Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 04:32:51 PM | |
| I can't just give up on the Medal of Honor series just like you guys; I remember how Medal of Honor used to own the FPS market! I know the last game was a little dissapointing, and it was indeed just in the name of competition (against Call of Duty), but I still have hope for an otherwise successful video game franchise. Danger Close, no matter what, make a campaign that drags at least over six hours! That little blemish of a campaign did not do! |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #6 by maverickman001 Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 04:34:25 PM | |
@3 i could not agree with you more.
am i the only person that liked modern warfare 2?? its better then black ops an world at war but saying that not as good as cod 4.
but i still find these better then medal of honor make it more like battlefield and less like cod plz battlefield 2 is best!!! |
|
Forum Posts: 970 | Comment #7 by Zombiedrd Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 04:39:06 PM | |
| I just wish FPS would add more than the US military. More people play games in the EU than in the US, why can't our armies be shown?(Outside of the UK SAS who is in everything too). Maybe a little less propaganda too. The last game was like I was watching a US Army recruiting commercial. |
|
Forum Posts: 150 | Comment #10 by MORTO hi Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 04:46:45 PM | |
Now we can find out what hapened to Rabbit.
I'm justy hoping the campaign is longer, because that is the only problem I had with the reboot. |
|
Forum Posts: 356 | Comment #11 by seven43861 Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 05:01:03 PM | |
| Here's hoping that they release an actual completed game this time. |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #12 by jamste5 Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 05:03:27 PM | |
Nothing any FPS developer do will beat the D-Day mission on MOH: Frontline.
Not even COD 4 could match that. |
|
Forum Posts: 127 | Comment #13 by Pr0ph3cy Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 05:06:30 PM | |
| oh dear god. Why did i buy this game |
|
Forum Posts: 149 | Comment #14 by GOWnage Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 05:10:00 PM | |
| The last MOH game was a perfect example of why Cliffy B wanted to be part of Bulletstorm. |
|
Forum Posts: 2599 | Comment #15 by Venomized Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 05:13:30 PM | |
@3
I actually really enjoyed medal of honor. Sure there was a few BS moments, but in all it was pretty good. I also think MoH is better than CoD. I think most shooter games are. People are just so use to CoD that they don't give other games a chance. Also a lot of people play CoD because that's what is popular and in. I am not saying it applies to everyone, but there is a decent amount of people who play it or buy it for that reason.
Anyways I look foward to their next game. CoD is dying thankfully and we are going to need another FPS War shooter gamer. As long as there is no Teir 1 achievement in their next game or Fire Controller, I will be happy.
Also I really hope someone makes a WW2 shooter gamer again that is online. Why not do a remake Cod 2! Now that CoD I really do love. |
|
Forum Posts: 2599 | Comment #16 by Venomized Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 05:15:52 PM | |
| @8 If you really believe that then you are an utter fool. Completely ignorant. |
|
Forum Posts: 3110 | Comment #17 by EliteShadowMan Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 05:17:04 PM | |
| how in the hell did such a trash game sell so well? they should just exclude MP altogether in the next MoH and just make it a epic 10+ hour campaign! |
|
Forum Posts: 140 | Comment #18 by Eternaltriumph Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 05:17:14 PM | |
MoH wasn't a bad game, people are just CoD fanboys. It was far from perfect though. There was only three major gripes with the game, aside from day one server issues but that's common now sadly.
1) Lack of unlockables. No sane person will disagree that reaching max rank and unlocking a single grenade, which follows the same exact guns with a different look was stupid.
2) Different engines for SP and MP. No practice, it didn't make a lot of sense.
3) Snipers were overpowered for the fact of OHKO, and everyone can use it. Limiting the amount of snipers on a single team would be much better than making them weaker...it's supposed to be a realistic game, one hit kills from a sniper are realistic. Having 12 snipers in an offensive mission and no infantry, no.
Other issues are people bitching about "lag" because you die in two shots (Realism?) and how hard it was to get a killstreak? Suck less and try to keep in mind not every ground soldier can call in a tomahawk missle.
If EA can fix these issues (and for the love of god, keep the Dirka Tomahawk!) they'll have a fantastic MP. |
|
Forum Posts: 52 | Comment #19 by Assasin13 Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 05:18:33 PM | |
| Yes! Enjoyed the first game, thought it was just a few improvements away from being awesome. |
|
Forum Posts: 208 | Comment #20 by Jonspach Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 05:19:43 PM | |
| @13 Battlefield 3 demo! |
|
Forum Posts: 52 | Comment #21 by Assasin13 Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 05:23:53 PM | |
| @15 I like call of duty because its a good game hence it sells so well. Not saying I don't play other games. I don't get all the cod hate. Also if its dying then why did it just take its own record of most sold copies. |
|
Forum Posts: 472 | Comment #22 by BackerMan Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 05:30:18 PM | |
| They should let Respawn do Medal of Honor and see if they can match Call of Duty. |
|
Forum Posts: 1098 | Comment #23 by xMidget_Furyx Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 05:35:53 PM | |
It would be nice if they really did listen to the 5 million helpless souls who paid for the game and improve on the good things that were in the reboot. bigger maps would be nice for one thing, it's total BS to get pinned down in your spawn at least do me a favor and spawn me in a different spot instead of closest to my just killed squadmate.
as for the single player it told an ok story but there was really no substance to the story. |
|
Forum Posts: 88 | Comment #24 by ScuzzyBunny FTN Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 05:38:12 PM | |
| ...and where is the French Military? Oh, they surrendered and went home. NVM. |
|
Forum Posts: 1313 | Comment #25 by Jellybean468 Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 05:42:47 PM | |
| The reason people don't like this multiplayer is that it is more that of a simulator than an arcade. Your health restores slower and fewer bullets kill you, more like COD's hardcore, and therefore it is a 'bad game'. |
|
Forum Posts: 388 | Comment #26 by Caramel Cardinal Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 05:44:37 PM | |
tis all good
though to be fair i think a fair chunk of the sales came from everyone hoping it to be as good as cod
just hope it has a longer campaign and ballanced multiplayer
@22 we can only hoe[
though think respawn are busy on MW3 and trying to get the brand name |
|
Forum Posts: 70 | Comment #27 by Ihazcandy4you Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 05:46:36 PM | |
MoH reboot had one of the more enjoyable campaigns I have played in a fps. Online was a joke. Whoever said call of duty is dying is delusional. Both the last two game has broken all sorts of sales records.
That said, I doubt I'll bother picking up the next medal of honor. Brink and battlefield 3 will likely soak up my fps needs for the next couple years, with black ops thrown in once and a while |
|
Forum Posts: 70 | Comment #28 by Ihazcandy4you Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 05:49:55 PM | |
Also, not a chance in he'll respawn is going to get the cod/mw brand name. Activation owns it. What there trying to get is the money owed them.
It would be interesting to see respawn do medal of honor, seeing as the people there started the series before starting infinity ward. |
|
Forum Posts: 209 | Comment #29 by TH3 XB0X G3N1U5 Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 05:50:35 PM | |
W.T.F.
why? it sucked! unless they are building it off of that. where i work, we got 7 copies for xbox and 7 for the ps3 when the game launched, right now, we still have those 7 copies for each console :/
does that not say anything there??? |
|
Forum Posts: 70 | Comment #30 by Ihazcandy4you Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 05:51:14 PM | |
Also, not a chance in he'll respawn is going to get the cod/mw brand name. Activation owns it. What there trying to get is the money owed them.
It would be interesting to see respawn do medal of honor, seeing as the people there started the series before starting infinity ward. |
|
Forum Posts: 40 | Comment #31 by JGar77 Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 05:57:24 PM | |
What I really enjoyed about Medal of Honor is that it was inspired by an actual ongoing war, with real soldiers. None of the other major modern first person shooters can claim any such attribute. That probably doesn't matter a lot to some people, but I've always thought about how Battlefield and Call of Duty continuously make modern games, but instead of making it based on the Iraq War or the War in Afghanistan, etc, they make it a near future war with many elements of today's conflict. And I think to myself, why? What's the point?
That being said, Medal of Honor was not as good of a game as Battlefield Bad Company 2 (I don't play CoD, so that's my closest comparison). But it did have enjoyable elements. The factuality, or maybe historical fictionality, of the game was the icing on the cake for me, but I do like the fast paced multiplayer and the campaign's emotional buildup. I was playing Halo Reach at the time so it was a nice contrast and a huge change of pace, just what I needed. The problem for me is that I didn't want to come back for more. I borrowed my father's copy a couple times, and have had no yearning to come back to it or finish the achievements.
There are things that can be done a lot better. The basis is there though, and I'm up for a sequel. |
|
Forum Posts: 126 | Comment #32 by Earth Djinn Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 06:22:01 PM | |
| I had a lot of fun with the MoH reboot and I an excited for the sequel. |
|
Forum Posts: 195 | Comment #33 by TigerII Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 06:39:14 PM | |
@8
The US military has one of the highest friendly fire rates, atrocity rates, and hell, British Territorial units beat the USMC in several wargames in the last few years. Territorials are the UK version of the US national Guard. US troops rape and pillage pretty much everywhere they go(Why do you think the US is hated by pretty much the whole world, the US acts like the Soviets of old) and the US had more casualties in the Gulf War due to friendly fire than enemy fire(As did the UK. A Regiment was hit hard by US A-10s). The Armies of the EU are much more professional and if in a unified force of the EU, could easily match the US). |
|
Forum Posts: 56 | Comment #34 by Laxi Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 06:39:43 PM | |
| another bad Medal of Honor, yay |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #35 by SG1 Warsquatch Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 06:43:13 PM | |
| Ill take another MOH over COD.. There would be no COD with out MOH but Battlefield will take the cake big time : ) |
|
Forum Posts: 140 | Comment #36 by ckingvengence Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 07:06:31 PM | |
| @33 well said, those Americans think their army is so great when their actually just a bunch of trigger happy gun nuts. |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #37 by xKTAx Ultimo Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 07:07:07 PM | |
| They are selling well now but this annual - bi-annual war game crap is gonna kill this market. COD, MW, and now MOH.....really??? |
|
Forum Posts: 1105 | Comment #38 by Pixo Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 07:13:00 PM | |
| This is gonna turn into was CoD is doing. It'll eventually just become the same crap and they'll milk it into the grave. |
|
Forum Posts: 173 | Comment #39 by Epilogue of Euphoria Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 07:18:34 PM | |
| Good to hear, I really liked the run with the Tier 1 guys. It wasn't great but it was still a pretty good game. The multi-player was alright, so long as you didn't mind fighting the magic sniper. |
|
Forum Posts: 18 | Comment #40 by Sh3rMaN420 Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 07:34:11 PM | |
| I really enjoyed MOH. Single player was fun and multiplayer you just have to take your time. Overall good game |
|
Forum Posts: 89 | Comment #41 by bearmod Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 07:40:40 PM | |
| Really? The first game was horrible, the graphics were shit, and it was full of bugs and glitched achievements |
|
Forum Posts: 4 | Comment #42 by QKT Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 07:45:23 PM | |
sequel?
does that mean a direct sequel to the story in the last one?
erp. |
|
Forum Posts: 11 | Comment #43 by Bananowns Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 07:48:22 PM | |
| #33 and #36, If American Armies are so damn stupid and European armies are so great, then why did we have to save your ass in WW2. |
|
Forum Posts: 1 | Comment #44 by Deathly Warlord Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 07:49:13 PM | |
| I played through the first game recently and liked it, so I'll probaly get the second. |
|
Forum Posts: 4 | Comment #45 by CamoChris Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 08:05:11 PM | |
| @43 Yeah, out puny European armies were so bad you had to save us. From the mighty German army. Who are European. *head explode* |
|
Forum Posts: 52 | Comment #46 by Assasin13 Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 08:10:48 PM | |
| @33 whered you get those stats from? Anyways I find it insulting how you say the United States Military sucks. I don't doubt that the EU military is good but so is the US one. Now anyways notice how the EU is like 30 countries and the US is like 1. |
|
Forum Posts: 270 | Comment #47 by davhuit Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 08:11:39 PM | |
Talking of WW2, this is what moh should have stayed.
Everyone says that WW2 was too exploited but me, I can't stand modern shooters any more. There is too much of it maybe more than WW2 shooters released. Not a day with a modern shooter news!! |
|
Forum Posts: 140 | Comment #48 by ckingvengence Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 08:11:40 PM | |
| @ 43 yh u join in a war at the last minute only because u know u are going to win because the european armies did most of the work. thats all that u do fight in a war against a weak enemy because u know u are going to win, and thats what u thought about vietnam and we all know how that turned out (U LOST) |
|
Forum Posts: 46 | Comment #49 by B0rnP3ac3mak3r Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 08:18:04 PM | |
@48 Yeah because we all know the war would've been won if Americans weren't there on D-Day and Iwo-Jima, Midway, Guadalcanal, and the others.
Don't hate on U.S. Army, it's just that our army is so iconic. We're all Allied right? |
|
Forum Posts: 140 | Comment #50 by ckingvengence Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 08:24:53 PM | |
| @ 49 yes we would of still won on those occassions and we are allied but most of the UK troops seem to die by friendly fire from the US |
|
Forum Posts: 1000 | Comment #51 by Dr Popodopolus Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 08:30:01 PM | |
| @48 I thought that's what they did in WW1. |
|
Forum Posts: 46 | Comment #52 by B0rnP3ac3mak3r Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 08:31:53 PM | |
| @50 Be in a war then tell me how friendly fire is controllable. |
|
Forum Posts: 98 | Comment #53 by Frankyg88 Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 08:31:57 PM | |
@46 America in theory is 50 countries that instead of being independent like Europe are just one big 'Country' And oh yeah America is Europe we bred you :)
@43 Nice help in WWI and joining a war at the end hardly counts, the only war tye US has been on without the full aid of the EU was Nam, and we all know how that worked out. UK had the Falklands and although a horrible war like most we still won without America.
On topic MoH was a good game and definitely better than any Cod game, the modern day gamer claims any game is shit that dosnt throw cheevo or checkpoints at you every five minutes. |
|
Forum Posts: 124 | Comment #54 by BuckfastNI Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 08:40:09 PM | |
I thought the single player was absolute shite, the apache machine gun looked and felt shite too which really took away the fun of the game. Poor AI and other issues need to be addressed.
However the multiplayer I actually really enjoyed and is one of the few online games I bother to max out my rank. The sniping was very good in my opinion the only downside to the MP was the small map size and lack of different weapons, abilities and attachments.
Would be more interested if they left the unreal engine behind and just used DICE's frostbite 2.0... |
|
Forum Posts: 1200 | Comment #55 by tripleb2k Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 08:59:31 PM | |
I really enjoyed the MP portion but the SP was pretty bad (graphics and gameplay wise). Hope they stick with one Developer or at least have some kind of communication between the 2 Developers. They felt like 2 different games, or even 2 different console generations.
Let them learn from the criticism and mistakes from the 2010 game and improve the next. |
|
Forum Posts: 512 | Comment #56 by KutleryKing Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 09:05:03 PM | |
| Will buy for Campaign. God did I love that campaign. |
|
Forum Posts: 30 | Comment #57 by Dov Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 09:06:53 PM | |
| Loved the single-player campaign for MoH, hated the multiplayer. Seriously, it seems weird to say this, but DICE needs to stay the fuck away from this franchise. It was obvious they had their B-team working on MOH's multiplayer while the studio was focused on the Vietnam expansion for BC2 and Battlefield 3. I'd rather have a consistent feel between the single-player and multiplayer and just have Danger Close develop both, including features from the single-player like prone, leaning, selectable fire modes, etc. Oh, and bring back the breathing control for sniping from MoH: Airbourne, it was so much better than clicking the stick. |
|
Forum Posts: 26 | Comment #58 by elsnoggler Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 09:08:18 PM | |
#54 - The spawn camping, the one thing you point out as something you liked about Medal of Honor MP, was pretty much the most glaringly imbalanced and annoying aspect of the game's MP that virtually everybody hated.
Well done. |
|
Forum Posts: 248 | Comment #59 by Warfighter1000 Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 09:25:03 PM | |
| I love moh, but mp wise keep dice out I don't want another sniper fest. But the mp is still better than bfbc2 or black ops. IN MY OPINION. |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #60 by TANGO at your 6 Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 09:45:18 PM | |
| well im super excited. no matter what anyone thinks, i thought they did a good job. yeah it could of been better in somethings, but all in all it was really good for being the first MOH in awhile. and the spin on the modern era is what everyone wants. i mean hasn't everyone played a world war 2 game, we have all stormed the beach of Normandy about a hundred times in about a billion world war 2 games. so im glad that MOH is going to make a second addition. just let me have a few months to play Battlefield 3 for a few months before releasing. |
|
Forum Posts: 11 | Comment #61 by Bananowns Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 09:56:06 PM | |
Anyone who took my comment seriously has no sense of humor. WW2 could not have been won without US help, but the us also needed european military support. In WW1 the Americans came in at the end of the war which broke the stalemate between the French and German armies.
Back on topic here, I thinks it's great a sequel is being made, however, they better not half-ass the multiplayer compared to bad company 2. |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #62 by ST3A1TH NINJ4 Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 11:32:35 PM | |
I cant wait for MoH 2, MoH campaign was so damn good.
...And i also dont get the shit storm thats going on in this comment board about whos better EU vs US armies its stupid. |
|
Forum Posts: 4149 | Comment #63 by VladimirK Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 11:35:03 PM | |
So wait, Mirror's Edge 2 just got put on hold yet another f-ing military FPS is being made now?
Ugghhh... |
|
Forum Posts: 106 | Comment #64 by Steakslave Friday, February 18, 2011 @ 11:47:01 PM | |
| Leave out the horrible "Fire Conntroller" achievement this time and I might rent it... |
|
Forum Posts: 22 | Comment #65 by M a DSCHuSZ Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 01:21:02 AM | |
Some hated the new MOH... Not me I loved the new Medal of Honor. Only thing that could have been better was the MP. It took me a while to master all the different gamemodes. Loved the section control (definite fav).
The story was thin but was still brilliant imo ( Being ex-military and all) Keep this up, will buy the next for sure! |
|
Forum Posts: 42 | Comment #66 by Quake007 Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 01:27:34 AM | |
| Google SAS selection pls. |
|
Forum Posts: 450 | Comment #67 by stevedb79 Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 02:33:01 AM | |
| @7 couldn't agree more |
|
Forum Posts: 450 | Comment #68 by stevedb79 Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 02:37:11 AM | |
| Sorry for the double post but @8 you suck donkey balls and are proberly a stuck up american (no offence to all Americans but you DID NOT win WWII...in fact when was the last war you actually won??) @33 well done...says it all! ;0) |
|
Forum Posts: 450 | Comment #69 by stevedb79 Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 02:44:36 AM | |
| A Quick Question.....Who the hell are the EU army?????....are people really that stupid???...Last I looked (I Live in UK) there is no such thing...the UK, France, Germany, Spain, Portugal....etc etc DO NOT make up some super army.....what the hell are all the Americans going on about???...please someone help me!!!...back on topic looking forward to this game |
|
Forum Posts: 1195 | Comment #70 by UberPirateNinja Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 03:06:34 AM | |
just make the campaign longer, and harder. it was easily one of the shortest campaigns i've played, and the hard difficulty was laughably easy. the mp was a nice mix of cod and bf, but i didn't play more than 3 matches of it as none of my friends picked the game up.
|
|
Forum Posts: 6 | Comment #71 by Caesar XI Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 03:18:13 AM | |
There is no better army unless Chinese they'l recruit anything with legs, US are to trigger happy and the EU have lost their share of wars, so stop the bitching and talk about something on topic.
Hopefully this game is better and longer than the first. |
|
Forum Posts: 85 | Comment #72 by Halme Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 03:39:13 AM | |
| I greatly enjoyed MoH's singleplayer campaign. So I'm exited about the sequel. MP was fun at first but somehow became little boring in a while. I'm sure the sequel will be even better on both campaign and multiplayer. |
|
Forum Posts: 7 | Comment #73 by wyliecoyote1973 Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 03:59:18 AM | |
| Thought DICE should have just done the whole game not just MP & dont know what people want or what they were expecting but personally think its brilliant. Very much team based like Bad Company ( if you dont talk your gonna lose).Dont get me wrong there is faults there is with every game! I only play combat mission as it is like BC & the others end just to soon & they should have bought out more maps for this.but loved the concept & the feel of this game & made it a nice in betweener to cod & BC so i say good luck for Danger Close & look forward to the next one. Now please give me more maps! 8-) |
|
Forum Posts: 38 | Comment #74 by Aussie27Legend Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 04:54:01 AM | |
| Cause last years Medal of Honor was such a great success... |
|
Forum Posts: 140 | Comment #75 by MAD MAZTEC Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 06:06:23 AM | |
1st one was shit
Campaign took me 3hrs on normal
multiplayer i could've walked in front of several buses because of their servers
Oh well, hopefully this one is much better! |
|
Forum Posts: 37 | Comment #76 by lethelerror Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 06:24:23 AM | |
| people seem to be forgetting it was the russians that got to berlin first and ended the war. |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #77 by KAZMAC77 Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 07:17:11 AM | |
| The first one was average at best, the story was very ho-hum, seen it all before and the multiplayer was very frustrating to say the least. Can't see this new one being any different to be honest. |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #78 by stealthykill213 Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 07:32:11 AM | |
| i would still be playing but there is no prestige mode. really mad about that |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #79 by stealthykill213 Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 07:40:03 AM | |
| also for all the ppl who didnt like the mp, it was because they were shit at it. It was a hard game and i hope they stick to that same core gameplay. Keep up the good work |
|
Forum Posts: 118 | Comment #80 by Nitewalkar Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 07:42:58 AM | |
| The first game was what you might expect if you breed COD6 with BF:BC2... Then drop the baby on it's head. |
|
Forum Posts: 2082 | Comment #81 by StillTIPPIN187 Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 07:44:42 AM | |
I very much enjoyed the single player of the first modern MoH. There is always room for improvement. But it was good none the less.
MP is what was messed up. The guns were very limited. And the it was wayy to easy for the anklets to spawn rape ppl.
I will pick up this none the less =]
|
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #82 by wrenphilth Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 07:56:45 AM | |
| hopefully this one doesnt feel generic it sort of felt like the Gobots sort of like a transformer but not quite there. I was just sort of upset with Kmart qualities it would have been 9.99 from the get go. I am not asking much just for some more story or something that makes you feel like your actually acomplishing something instead of whatever that was. I was fighting off sleep while playing this one almost made my stint in Iraq would be a better game. If I hear Activision makes my life into a game I am suing. Call of Duty Modern Water Delivery got to dodge aircraft and dumb drivers while driving a 10k AT forklift with 2 pallets of water with out losing a load. throw in random rocket and mortar attacks for ambience. now that will be realism. I know I know all you gun nuts out there you will get to have my M9 and M16A2 with 30 rounds each that get to stay in their holster or in the back of the forklift the whole time only to get cleared while going to the chowhall. Or you can enjoy the super realism of cleaning them. ok maybe I got a little out of hand here but come on at least the game I talked about that was based on true life events would be more exciting then that game. The Sequel will be a supply troop simulator |
|
Forum Posts: 882 | Comment #83 by DeafSunchaser Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 07:58:52 AM | |
| shit game even tho i did 1000g on it and EA sucks! |
|
Forum Posts: 19 | Comment #84 by Mike2010 Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 08:26:57 AM | |
| Concentrate on bad company |
|
Forum Posts: 65 | Comment #85 by StevieFa Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 08:47:10 AM | |
| @33 also remember the british hostage not to long ago that was confirmed to be killed by an american grenade during there failed rescue attempt even the person in charge of the operation said he would have prefered a squad of the SAS |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #86 by M Renegade Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 08:58:49 AM | |
| The reason there was a "success" of 5 million copies sold was that people thought it was going to be good, or a good game to play before Black Ops. So all the people that first day bought, and midnight released....roughly about 5 million copies. (Seeing as Black Ops had about 7 million copies first day sold....) But before the word got out that this game was bad, the damage was done, hopefully people will learn and not buy the sequel. (Or if they ditch DICE) |
|
Forum Posts: 1915 | Comment #87 by bLaKgRaVy Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 09:54:54 AM | |
Did anyone ever play Day of Defeat Source on the PC (by Valve, no less)? It's a WW2 shooter (started out as a mod for Half-Life) that's just like the gametype War in the Treyarch CoD's. But, in DoD, you have 4-6 classes to choose from as far as weapons, but there is a limit as to how many a team could have. They had rifleman, assault, support, sniper, machine gunner and rockets. There were up to 12 people on a team. Once the slot was filled on say sniper (I think you could have up to 3 of each class on a team at one time), you had to pick another class. You could change classes each time you died, but there was always a set amount of classes you could have in a game. I don't know why other companies haven't tried that out. It makes the game more balanced and fun. Below is an example of the win/loss for both the Allies and Axis, and as you can see, they're pretty even.
http://www.dayofdefeat.com/stats/maps.html |
|
Forum Posts: 1 | Comment #88 by TurnerVII Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 11:20:12 AM | |
@46 You do realise the US stands for United States right? Many states which are the size of individual countries which co-operate under one name... Oh look just like the European union.. Besides the European union does not have a Unified military. Why dont you all stop bitching about each country as you will find most of the EU are members of NATO and so are the US...
So why not make games involving more of NATO forces rather than just the US and the SAS. Also the need to hate on the French military is pretty stupid now, they are becoming quite the military power(Even more with the partnerships with the UK) and you will find the French resistance in the war was also key to helping Allied forces even step foot on European soil. |
|
Forum Posts: 1 | Comment #89 by TurnerVII Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 11:25:51 AM | |
@71 The US are not trigger happy, sure they have more soldiers deployed in Iraq so they are more likely to become involved in a bit of friendly fire and accidental civilian casualties but that doesn't mean they are trigger happy.
You can say the EU has lost many wars but they have rarely ever fought as one. They fought individually and generally against each other, we just have more history than most places to look at.
Im English by the way(Yes some of us stick up for the US, sometimes) |
|
Forum Posts: 162 | Comment #90 by SN1P3RSTU113 Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 11:33:50 AM | |
| @87 I play DoD it's really fun :) I also don't understand why any console games have implemented this. Only other games I know have done this are on PC (Red Orchestra, TF2 etc.) |
|
Forum Posts: 33 | Comment #91 by Jan Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 01:08:26 PM | |
| Longer SP please :-[ |
|
Forum Posts: 92 | Comment #92 by Thrall51906 Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 01:21:04 PM | |
| thought it was good, sp too short. love mp though, looking forward to the sequel! |
|
Forum Posts: 76 | Comment #93 by pot Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 01:28:45 PM | |
| Guys, can we stop with the nationalist crap? Nothing with being patriotic and liking your own military but why the need to bash others? |
|
Forum Posts: 2 | Comment #94 by MIKEyoungSON Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 01:48:00 PM | |
| yay a new moh |
|
Forum Posts: 1 | Comment #95 by Kyle de Coolio Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 02:15:57 PM | |
*sigh*
More military FPS?
Real surprise there right? |
|
Forum Posts: 106 | Comment #96 by Big Killa C Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 03:21:13 PM | |
We sold 5 million copies blah blah blah. I got suckered into buying the game when it first came out just like everyone else. Wish I never bought it. The game meant well, but did not execute. Trying to be Call of Duty, trying to be Battlefield, but FAILING and being neither. It should try to be Medal of Honor.
If it did so well how come when I went to Best Buy only to see it already down to $39.99 and an entire shelf is full of them? Answer: No one is buying the game because word of mouth says the game sucks. Oh and Limited Edition? It's the only edition I see. The only reason I held on to the game is for the Battlefield 3 beta. |
|
Forum Posts: 10 | Comment #97 by Finnish Sammich Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 03:42:21 PM | |
| More single player achievements please. |
|
Forum Posts: 228 | Comment #98 by I X I Shock I Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 04:18:17 PM | |
I wonder how many of those 5M were sold back to get Black Ops at a reduced rate at some of the retailers. I remember hearing some of the UK ones doing that XD
Fucking hilarious. |
|
Forum Posts: 5 | Comment #99 by zeassumpcao Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 05:48:27 PM | |
Don't think it'll make more success than Call Of Duty series.
Glad to know there are more FPS titles to compete. This way innovation does not stop. |
|
Forum Posts: 970 | Comment #100 by Zombiedrd Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 06:12:54 PM | |
Wow, I didn't mean to start a flame war. I wasn't trying to bash the US, just saying I would like to see more nations in ADDITION to the US. And come on guys(Fellow Europeans), we all know that the Americans broke the deadlock of WWI. Yes it was at the end, but we(The British Army) were exhausted from Passchendaele and the French were just recovering from the mutinies. Russia was out and Italy was retreating from the Austro-Hungarians. The Americans added new blood and maybe more importantly, boosted the ALLIES(You know, the thing we are still supposed to be) moral.
As for two, yes the Yanks were late, but by no means did they come in at the end. As proud a Brit as I am, there is no way we had the manpower to invade and hold Italy and France/Low countries without the US. If you want to congratulate anyone for defeating the Nazis, it was the USSR. The Eastern Front was the largest warzone in history. And besides, they pretty much destroyed the Japanese Navy and Army(Along with China).
I think it is just a fad these days to hate the US, so people now try to undercut its accomplishments, while over embellish its failures. Like @33. All nations have committed atrocities and all have had friendly fire accidents, even us. |
|
Forum Posts: 3 | Comment #101 by AwsmGuitar Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 06:25:27 PM | |
| god dammit i love fps's but even i have to admit this is getting crowded, at least wait a bit more will you? BF3 and new cod coming out, next will be BC3 too and crisis 2, what the fuck is wront with these guys? everyone loves money but this is way too much, itll start bringing down the market |
|
Forum Posts: 218 | Comment #102 by the ferenczy Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 07:09:24 PM | |
| MoH was a decent game, but competing with CoD and BF makes it look and feel second rate. SP was ok, but mp was too unbalanced and felt like a watered down Battlefield. Maybe they will take all the criticism into account and put out an improved game. I was very suprised at 5 million sold. |
|
Forum Posts: 317 | Comment #103 by DborKnowsBest Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 08:03:39 PM | |
| Bought the last MoH for the Battlefield3 Beta, they're going to have to go all Oprah on me and throw in a car before I buy any more bargain bin trash from Danger Close. |
|
Forum Posts: 2336 | Comment #104 by KNIGHTOFSERA Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 09:20:38 PM | |
| MOH ...was alright, the mutiplayer just didnt feel right, and the single player just felt pointless...I know they wanted to give a more realistic experience but it just ended up okay... |
|
Forum Posts: 178 | Comment #105 by PuttyGod Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 09:47:49 PM | |
Oh no... I didn't realize so many people bought this garbage. The single player was a stale, sandy, shooting gallery. The MP was BC2 minus the depth, vehicles, variety, and fun; and the entire package, as a whole, was somewhat offensive, especially considering the "respect and authenticity" that was supposedly involved in the development (to the guy who suggested they label the other team as "Taliban," way to keep it classy, you stupid bastard). By pretending to pay honor to the real men and women who are out there, they really succeeded in just the opposite. Hell, at least MW2 didn't try to portray any real conflicts; by completely avoiding potentially offensive scenarios, they simultaneously injected infinitely more variety to the environments and story.
|
|
Forum Posts: 1367 | Comment #106 by EMP Saturday, February 19, 2011 @ 10:14:41 PM | |
| Never played the last one if I did I would just rent it until they can showcase a game that will be a great mp competitor. |
|
Forum Posts: 10 | Comment #107 by mulendorm Sunday, February 20, 2011 @ 05:43:01 AM | |
| Just make it the game it should have been. MoH just didn't feel quite right... I know they can do it |
|
Forum Posts: 124 | Comment #108 by BuckfastNI Sunday, February 20, 2011 @ 06:42:18 AM | |
@ 57 Read properly arsehole, where in my comment do I mention 'spawn' or 'camping'!?
One hit kills from sniping is realistic and everyone can do it so how is it unbalanced? It's not like you get sniped by a guy with one shot, respawn as a sniper and have to shoot him 3 times is it now!? Twat.
From my experience the teams were always well balanced between smokers and infantry, usually with only 2 or 3 snipers at any one time.
As always when it comes to popular multiplayer games, don't blame the game, blame yourself. I know in any game when playing sniper class, I pop maybe one or two people then relocate. If others don't do the same then rather than bitch you should get good/intelligent enough to flank them. Or do us all a favour and fuck off and stop playing altogether... |
|
Forum Posts: 358 | Comment #109 by turkeyfly Sunday, February 20, 2011 @ 06:50:07 AM | |
| This game just lacked the "WOW" factor that they promised everyone. It was just a "B or B-" game. |
|
Forum Posts: 463 | Comment #110 by francisrossi Sunday, February 20, 2011 @ 07:00:36 AM | |
| I don't see the point in EA bringing out competing military FPS games, especially when they get the same devs working on them. You're competing with yourself, which is somewhat counter-productive. |
|
Forum Posts: 140 | Comment #111 by Eternaltriumph Sunday, February 20, 2011 @ 10:12:43 AM | |
FPS' are to this gen as platformers were to the NES era. They're what's selling. EA has every right to release two love children in a single year because it'll sell extremely well as long as they market right and set them apart.
IE, releasing Bad Company 3 very close to MoH will be a terrible business call. As will releasing either very close to the next CoD. BC3 can stand a chance against CoD though; MoH would get smothered, unfortunately. |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #112 by HaloKing343 Sunday, February 20, 2011 @ 10:30:05 AM | |
| eh... |
|
Forum Posts: 2 | Comment #113 by SweatyPete x Sunday, February 20, 2011 @ 11:54:33 AM | |
| Still need to buy the original which ain't bad now because you can pick it up for around £25, however, heard mixed reviews, but then a few of my mates play it so may have to play first then give this a shot. |
|
Forum Posts: 467 | Comment #114 by NawtyCawty Sunday, February 20, 2011 @ 12:29:31 PM | |
| #29 it just means you work in a crap shop thats all |
|
Forum Posts: 20 | Comment #115 by japocbeast Sunday, February 20, 2011 @ 01:55:54 PM | |
| Couple o story mission in moh were shit hot, apache and ambush to mention, far too short tho and mp even though it was fun it felt watered down by dice I think to not detract from BC Vietnam and 3. Worth a go tho. |
|
Forum Posts: 28 | Comment #116 by Bramwell420 Sunday, February 20, 2011 @ 03:08:09 PM | |
| Last I checked this was a European website, and last I checked America and Europe were better buddies than Spongebob and Patrick. So for any European gamer to badmouth America or any American gamer to badmouth Europe, is just plain retarded and you should be ashamed of yourself. Because when WWIII comes and goes, we'll all be standing side-by-side in the ashes of our enemies. Because unified we are the greatest threat ever to walk this great planet. 'Nuff said. |
|
Forum Posts: 5 | Comment #117 by MielikkisChosen Sunday, February 20, 2011 @ 03:55:11 PM | |
| Speaking as a former serviceman, I really enjoyed the reboot. The campaign may have been short, but it was still a great game. The relationship between the characters gives an actual sense of brotherhood, something you don't get in most of the other military shooters. The ending was fantastic and I will definitely be picking up the next game. Plus, if you give the multiplayer an actual chance, it grows on you quite a bit. What the next game needs is a longer campaign and less sniper-friendly maps for the multiplayer. Fix those things and the next MoH will be a good contender. |
|
Forum Posts: 356 | Comment #118 by seven43861 Sunday, February 20, 2011 @ 09:26:19 PM | |
| This is what happens when there's no recent news reports on the site over the weekend. People start bad mouthing eachother over the stupidest reasons, all off topic of the actual news article. Great War bad mouthing, it's fun for the whole family, even grand-father has a stake in the argument. |
|
Forum Posts: 8 | Comment #119 by Rothshield Sunday, February 20, 2011 @ 11:56:10 PM | |
| Why all this hating between countries? Especially over a pretty lame game. Soldiers, no matter where they're from deserve respect. They believe what they are doing is right and put their lives on the line while we play freaking video games. Governments may have side agendas and crooked reasons, but your soldiers stand strong for you and your families. They defend you so you should at least do the same. |
|
Forum Posts: 111 | Comment #121 by todd_pip33 Monday, February 21, 2011 @ 02:21:38 AM | |
| As someone who was extremely excited for this reboot due to Medal of Honor (PS1) being my first FPS ever, I walked away from the game...disgusted. This reboot...well, like many others here, the SP was lackluster. Too short, too "robotic" (meaning the game feels like its holding your hand), and way too "been there, done that." The MP...was fair at best, especially in Combat Mission, and horrible at it's worst a la Team Assault. Spawn camping, unbalanced gunplay, lack of depth, and well...the next one a non-buy. Too much wrong the first time around for me to plunge another $60. |
|
Forum Posts: 8 | Comment #122 by MoraleStopsHere Monday, February 21, 2011 @ 04:30:16 AM | |
| do hope it is better |
|
Forum Posts: 7 | Comment #123 by wyliecoyote1973 Monday, February 21, 2011 @ 06:43:04 AM | |
| @120 LMAO |
|
Forum Posts: 180 | Comment #125 by Super Geek No1 Monday, February 21, 2011 @ 12:55:23 PM | |
| MoH has terrible could the characters look any more generic. All the Military guys looked the same with just slightly different skin tone hard to believe DICE has a hand in that as BF2 was awesome. No offence but EA hyped this rubbish out of the game so people rushed to buy it in anticipation it would rival CoD but it failed to deliver the goods so now I don't think the next one even sell 2 million yet alone 5. |
|
Forum Posts: 29 | Comment #126 by crunchb3rry Monday, February 21, 2011 @ 06:22:06 PM | |
| They need to just take this game engine and remake the original PS1 Medal of Honor. |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #127 by NegativeExample Wednesday, February 23, 2011 @ 05:10:55 PM | |
| The last Medal of Honour was great but was very glitch |
|
Forum Posts: 47 | Comment #128 by Guyguyxtreme Saturday, February 26, 2011 @ 10:34:42 AM | |
| I think medal of honour is in between Battlefield and CoD. I tneeds to take a side and stick with it, not just sit on the fence. |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #129 by DemonMonkey Saturday, April 30, 2011 @ 06:58:30 PM | |
| I love this game so Much! I hope MOH 2 is even better,not worse. |
|
Forum Posts: 98 | Comment #130 by Itstheimpaler Monday, June 06, 2011 @ 12:32:23 PM | |
| My only pray is that MoH2 is longer in story line, and maybe a twist in the game wouldn't be bad "hint hint" |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #131 by DeFalKoniiZ3 Wednesday, June 08, 2011 @ 02:01:33 PM | |
what we need is a longer campaign + balanced wepons in multiplayer...
oh yeah i just want to say that there view on sniper rifles is perfect,thers no way you could survive a shot from one of those within 300m to the chest area,i know because i shoot them all the time what they need to do is give more cover that what was lacking in this game,kandahar marketplace was a good cover to cover map soo was the map kabul city ruins.
when i said balanced wepons i meant some of those SMG's,their high rate of fire and stopping power fucking made it impossible to win 1v1 with an assault rifle.
the sequal should include Cover,balance (overall) and maybe a mode that involves air vehicals and land vehicals... |
|
Forum Posts: 40 | Comment #132 by Macklishh Sunday, August 21, 2011 @ 01:23:16 AM | |
I liked the first enough to rent the new one when it becomes available. I agree the campaign was good, yet rather short and the MP was terrible.
With that said, anyone who thinks there's a better FPS franchise than CoD (Modern Warfare especially) is an idiot. |
|
