Forum Posts: 4 | Comment #1 by honered1 Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 05:11:27 AM | |
| should be interesting to see how this effects future games |
|
Forum Posts: 1353 | Comment #2 by Emfulz Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 05:14:18 AM | |
| Well there goes our beloved Arkham Asylum 2. :( |
|
Forum Posts: 7 | Comment #3 by Richie82 [STAFF] Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 05:16:59 AM | |
| @2 Not at all - it just means that Warner will be publishing it now. It won't affect Arkham Asylum 2 at all. Don't worry! |
|
Forum Posts: 901 | Comment #4 by Ooyah Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 05:19:34 AM | |
| #2 - Arkham Asylum 2 is already well underway, so I doubt if they would pull it now... especially as it will rake in the cash. |
|
Forum Posts: 4081 | Comment #5 by evokazz Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 05:24:05 AM | |
Nice to see Eidos still hanging in there (just) even with their financial issues. |
|
Forum Posts: 262 | Comment #6 by II M1CK3H II Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 05:30:21 AM | |
| Midway were always doomed. I don't think they made 1 playable game. |
|
Forum Posts: 30 | Comment #7 by Astrex Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 05:34:05 AM | |
| I don't undertand how Arkham 2 will work if your running around Gotham? |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #8 by Munchen Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 05:35:46 AM | |
| Looking sooo much forward to Arkham Asylum 2 :) |
|
Forum Posts: 1353 | Comment #9 by Emfulz Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 05:57:35 AM | |
| @#3 & #4, I guess I didn't read that correctly. :) I loved Arkham Asylum besides that it was too short and I really couldn't see replaying it but I can't wait for Arkham Asylum 2. :D |
|
Forum Posts: 40 | Comment #10 by Richmyster6907 Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 06:05:59 AM | |
| hope this doesn't become a cash cow franchise but we will see least they started arkham 2 before this |
|
Forum Posts: 2 | Comment #11 by Damodar Thade Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 06:12:16 AM | |
| Hopefully warner leave the game to Rocksteady and dont meddle in what there not good at. |
|
Forum Posts: 313 | Comment #12 by Kyanite Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 06:15:29 AM | |
@ #6: Stop being stupid.
@ #5: I wasn't aware that Square Enix was having financial issues.
Anyway, a good move on Warner's part. Let's hope they can publish a good Batman game. |
|
Forum Posts: 515 | Comment #13 by JuanOrtizSr Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 06:22:13 AM | |
| #9 - Are you kidding me?! Short?! I don't think so! Replayable? HELL YEAH! I absolutly love this game (too bad DLC Achievements were not available)! I played it on Normal first then after the game was over, I couldn't wait to play it again! I even asked my Friends if they wanted 1000G for this game just to keep playing it! I know some gamers and fans were disappointed with the ending, but TRUE Batman fans know that Batman will NEVER sink to The Joker's level (lesson learned, right, guys?). Can't wait for Arkham 2! Way to rock, Rocksteady! BEST. SUPERHERO. GAME. EVER. |
|
Forum Posts: 2084 | Comment #14 by mjc0961 Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 06:31:34 AM | |
| I don't care if EA buys the rights to publish the game. Rocksteady clearly knows what they are doing and BAA2 is a day one purchase. |
|
Forum Posts: 8 | Comment #15 by Thrall320 Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 07:01:23 AM | |
| As long as Rock Steady isn't effected poorly by this, I'm good. |
|
Forum Posts: 1224 | Comment #16 by CunningFox Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 07:08:51 AM | |
#12 He said Eidos not Square Enix
This is going to be interesting to see how warner affects Arkham Asylum 2. |
|
Forum Posts: 118 | Comment #17 by clach plype Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 07:22:08 AM | |
#16 Eidos is was taken over by Square Enix Europe last year.
As long as the game is still great to play I'm don't care who has owns Rock Steady. |
|
Forum Posts: 140 | Comment #18 by Comatose Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 07:29:35 AM | |
@6
If you believe that...then you must have just started gaming yesterday. |
|
Forum Posts: 189 | Comment #19 by tsydrown Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 08:01:30 AM | |
| Doesn't matter who publishes it, provided Rocksteady stays as Devel. of the game. They did a fantastic job of AA! They only issue I had (like many others) was once you've completed it, that's pretty much it! I got it on a weeks rental and only just fell short of my 2nd playthrough (Hard) and the final Fight Challenge. Needs a little more extra stuff to do once the Main Story is completed. I don't mean MP, but more challenges etc would be a start . . . X-D |
|
Forum Posts: 1000 | Comment #20 by Dr Popodopolus Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 08:03:33 AM | |
| Batman Arkham Asylum: Not in Arkham Asylum anymore. |
|
Forum Posts: 1178 | Comment #21 by MartyMcFly Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 08:19:52 AM | |
| @19, there's free DLC that includes new challenge maps if that interests you. |
|
Forum Posts: 1912 | Comment #22 by bLaKgRaVy Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 09:06:08 AM | |
| They saw that Eidos made a bunch of money on the first one so they just had to snatch the license up for themselves, making rich people richer. Shit move. |
|
Forum Posts: 71 | Comment #23 by Dark Knight1990 Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 09:24:59 AM | |
| I'm actually happy about this. Warner has a good track record with games releases. I'm interested to see how they handle the rights. |
|
Forum Posts: 46 | Comment #24 by Jor-El Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 09:57:02 AM | |
Awesome news. I'd love to see Rocksteady do other games with DC Characters. I would love for them to tackle on a Superman game & see what they come up with. Also another Justice League game.
Then another fighting game ala MK vs DCU, but this time let it only feature DC Heroes vs. DC Villains. Big roster with 30+ playable characters plus more as unlockables & then more as DLC. |
|
Forum Posts: 312 | Comment #25 by Kronos1982 Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 10:13:20 AM | |
| Maybe we'll see a good Supes or even a GL game now. |
|
Forum Posts: 167 | Comment #26 by The Globalizer Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 11:12:42 AM | |
| I'd like to see WB up their efforts, they could be a real player in cinematic video games. |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #27 by a dying animal Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 01:28:11 PM | |
| I wonder if this will effect how Arham Asylum 2 turns out. |
|
Forum Posts: 26 | Comment #28 by DXBlaze Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 02:00:40 PM | |
| @24 You've made me think...I'm not into the vs. games, so I don't know if it already exists but if it doesn't, I think what would be great right now is a DC vs Marvel game. |
|
Forum Posts: 46 | Comment #29 by Jor-El Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 02:06:54 PM | |
DC vs Marvel - no, just no. I don't like Marvel personally as i grew up on DC and til this day, it's all i like.
So i would love to have a DC fighting game using the same engine as the MK vs DCU one, but only have DC Characters in it. |
|
Forum Posts: 10 | Comment #30 by ERIKDOTCOM Tuesday, February 23, 2010 @ 05:54:34 PM | |
| Hmm, more MK games possibly? |
|
Forum Posts: 583 | Comment #31 by doomey Wednesday, February 24, 2010 @ 05:58:41 AM | |
| mk vs dc II? ummm, no, maybe not. |
|
Forum Posts: 1 | Comment #32 by The Scrump Wednesday, February 24, 2010 @ 09:54:33 AM | |
| I'm pretty sure "Arkham Asylum 2" is a working title. It may end up being Batman (some other subtitle). Either way it will be great. |
|
Forum Posts: 173 | Comment #33 by Blue Thunder28 Thursday, February 25, 2010 @ 08:12:30 AM | |
| didn't Warner screw over the Watchmen XBLA games by pricing them way too high. or... |
|
