
Forum Posts: 101 | Comment #1 by ShinAkuma Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:01:07 AM | |
| wow... This looks awesome >_> |
|

Forum Posts: 463 | Comment #2 by M1 Punk Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:02:41 AM | |
| Definitely sounds more enjoyable than Close Quarters. Anyway, I don't think this DLC will add new guns, it's all about vehicles obviously. But there are more than enough guns for now. |
|

Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #3 by Th3Choz3NG4m3R Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:04:42 AM | |
| Biggest map for the biggest game that failed last year. |
|

Forum Posts: 156 | Comment #4 by Kinky Mong Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:07:11 AM | |
| I can't wait for the biggest map ever so I can wander around for even longer than I do on Caspian Border without seeing any other players because the console versions have a lower player limit. |
|

Forum Posts: 325 | Comment #5 by Blackest Metal Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:10:18 AM | |
| Bigger doesnt mean better when you only have 24 players max in a game |
|

Forum Posts: 19 | Comment #6 by Dasha UK Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:10:49 AM | |
@3 wait.... this isnt a mw3 article On topic more battlefield is always good ! |
|

Forum Posts: 1167 | Comment #7 by InsaneKane87 Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:23:17 AM | |
| Biggest map for 24 players on console.. it will be like finding Waldo. |
|

Forum Posts: 463 | Comment #8 by M1 Punk Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:27:28 AM | |
| @7 Not if people actually use the vehicles instead of playing Rambo. |
|

Forum Posts: 518 | Comment #9 by Natetendo83 Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:31:21 AM | |
| I'm not worried about the map size for 24 players. With enough vehicles there will be no problems getting to objectives and finding some action. If you want action on the big maps you have to PTFO, which is the point of the game. |
|

Forum Posts: 2 | Comment #10 by RDWatson16 Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:32:39 AM | |
BORING |
|

Forum Posts: 7 | Comment #11 by spike2055 Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:35:54 AM | |
| @9 what does PTFO mean? |
|

Forum Posts: 562 | Comment #12 by SpectreSoldier Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:38:36 AM | |
| @11 Play The Fucking Objective |
|

Forum Posts: 6 | Comment #13 by The Red Russian Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:39:09 AM | |
| @7 Probably not, there will still be certain areas of the map with the most action and a lot of parts of the map will rarely be packed, unfortunately. But, the bigger, the better, in my eyes. |
|

Forum Posts: 1431 | Comment #14 by ConfusedGeek Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:39:09 AM | |
im sure, no matter how large it is, they will find and kill me. but September? probably late september too. |
|

Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #15 by ThoracicKez Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:49:39 AM | |
| @12 that is a stupid acronym |
|

Forum Posts: 106 | Comment #16 by DEFCON 1 Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 09:52:54 AM | |
| fuck we need bad company 3 for console already. |
|

Forum Posts: 14187 | Comment #17 by B A R 4 D Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 10:03:01 AM | |
| It best be 3 times bigger than Khrag Island :D |
|

Forum Posts: 3662 | Comment #18 by littlejay Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 10:15:24 AM | |
| Can't wait for this expansion, but there isn't really any new news here. I guess everyone just needed to post the most recent blog post on it :p |
|

Forum Posts: 1800 | Comment #19 by CoregBlue1 Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 10:17:39 AM | |
what you all forget is that the pc servers will probably get space for twice the amount of players because the maps are so big. on console with already only 12? if you don“t have a vehicle you can suicide or run for an hour. |
|

Forum Posts: 1800 | Comment #20 by CoregBlue1 Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 10:18:40 AM | |
| 12 on each side of course. |
|

Forum Posts: 3457 | Comment #21 by Kaiyo Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 10:28:43 AM | |
| Its even better in the PC version. |
|

Forum Posts: 6004 | Comment #22 by Opiate42 Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 10:49:13 AM | |
Want. Want this with 64 player matches. But still want. |
|

Forum Posts: 310 | Comment #23 by STONE DEVIL Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 11:40:37 AM | |
| Battlefield history??? how much history does it really have? Come on now. 4000 MSP NO F*CKING WAY. Overpriced shit just like Activision and COD. |
|

Forum Posts: 46 | Comment #24 by bio187 Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 11:49:40 AM | |
@23 4000 for 5 expansion packs + lots of other extras..... yeah.... just as bad.... totally not worth it #troll |
|

Forum Posts: 141 | Comment #25 by Komrade Kayce Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 11:50:50 AM | |
@23 21 games incl expansions at my count, spanning 10 years. Nobody is charging 4000 points for this map pack. They are charging 1200. And if you've played any of the Battlefield games (which you have not, at least on the Xbox 360), 15 bucks for four maps, new guns, new vehicles and in a few cases, almost an entirely new game, is pretty good. Its 4000 points if you want all 5 expansions for the game paid for up front, instead of 6000 points paying for them individually. And its not like they threw them at everyone at launch, when playing them, its pretty easy to see the amount of work that they put into every map. Even maps that are overhauls of previous Battlfield games werent just pushed in, they were actually built again from the ground up just using the ancestor map as a blueprint. But of course, you weren't looking for logic here. Sorry. |
|

Forum Posts: 2 | Comment #26 by jonah fenton Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 12:00:09 PM | |
| shit game |
|

Forum Posts: 15 | Comment #27 by Jack Flak Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 12:01:19 PM | |
| Bigger than BF2? I don't think so. |
|

Forum Posts: 105 | Comment #28 by ChosenOne Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 12:02:18 PM | |
| It may have the biggest maps, but that will be incredibly boring seeing as consoles is still at 12 v 12 for the regular shipped maps, 8 v 8 for the CQ DLC and probably 12 v 12 again for this DLC. Endless running if you don't get a vehicle. |
|

Forum Posts: 3 | Comment #29 by Spastic Manatee Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 12:02:45 PM | |
| HOOOOOOOOOLYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY FFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKK! Tanks! Tanks and more tanks! This will be epic. Engineers will have a field day... |
|

Forum Posts: 22 | Comment #30 by MustaPastori Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 12:29:04 PM | |
| Battlefield history = since BC2 probably, knowing DICE. No way will we see a map even close as big as El Alamein from 1942. |
|

Forum Posts: 15 | Comment #31 by Jack Flak Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 12:59:59 PM | |
| @30 Bad Company is not even classified as Battlefield in my book. |
|

Forum Posts: 28 | Comment #33 by Bramwell420 Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 01:14:25 PM | |
| Wow, I dont even know where to begin. There are so many ignorant, uneducated, or straight up trollish comments to respond to. Haha, I just don't know how anybody who knows anything about videogames could not respect this game. |
|

Forum Posts: 2599 | Comment #34 by Venomized Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 01:41:23 PM | |
@29 @32 I hate douchebags like you who mess up the comments system. Don't bother posting. |
|

Forum Posts: 10 | Comment #35 by toonsim2 Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 02:02:40 PM | |
| How about an IP ban for 29. |
|

Forum Posts: 999 | Comment #36 by Dr Popodopolus Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 02:03:55 PM | |
| #33 is gey |
|

Forum Posts: 203 | Comment #37 by Septic Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 02:41:42 PM | |
| 36 is a COD FanBoy |
|

Forum Posts: 1660 | Comment #38 by Rapturous Rich Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 02:57:51 PM | |
| Lol, STONE DEVIL, you never cease to amaze me with how fucking stupid you are. Go and play in traffic and do everyone a favour. |
|

Forum Posts: 16 | Comment #39 by z3r0SHADOW Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 03:00:08 PM | |
| @25: no new weapons, only vehicles |
|

Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #40 by XD ARmaGeddON Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 03:22:38 PM | |
| Can you buy the dlc separate from the premium. |
|

Forum Posts: 15 | Comment #41 by Jack Flak Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 03:42:18 PM | |
| @ Yeah but it will end up costing 20% more than premium. $60 instead of 50, or whatever your currency is. |
|

Forum Posts: 15 | Comment #42 by Jack Flak Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 03:43:32 PM | |
| @40 |
|

Forum Posts: 5 | Comment #43 by GamePlayUK Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 04:26:41 PM | |
| @3 How did it fail? I find it fun... you must be a COD fanboy... get some taste. |
|

Forum Posts: 5 | Comment #44 by Ghosty McGoo Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 05:13:31 PM | |
| @33 let me tell you why I don't respect this game, I sold it over two monts ago so i don't how bad it is now, but to start things off I'd be lucky if i went a day without BF3 freezing on me, another thing would be the map design is awful compared to BC2 considering most of them are just rush maps converted to conquest, so one team has a massive advantge over the other (I.E. op metro). Also, the maps are so huge for the amount of players that it's like trying ti find a needle in a haystack most of the time, and for a game who bragged about realism, a scope that reflects a sun that isn't there is pretty ridiculous, or tanks that slide down even the slightest slopes, or jets that get hit by a tank and still be able to fly. |
|

Forum Posts: 141 | Comment #45 by Komrade Kayce Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 05:36:52 PM | |
@39 This one only has new vehicles. But I was talking in a general sense. You're getting something new other than just maps with each Battlefield DLC. |
|

Forum Posts: 112 | Comment #46 by oO Triple G Oo Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 08:59:50 PM | |
| @45: Yes, and it's been confirmed that the last two, Aftermath and Endgame will have both new vehicles and new weapons. |
|

Forum Posts: 2599 | Comment #47 by Venomized Friday, July 13, 2012 @ 12:30:01 AM | |
| @44 I love battlefield, and I am not going to name all the reasons and annoy you with them, BUT I can say there are a lot of things I hate about it, and I can tell you with certainty that this game is compeletely far off from being realistic. They say they try for the realistic approach, but there are so many things I can name that are unrealistc. The first one the comes off the top of my head is how you can revive a teammate after he has been shot, even if he has been shot in the head. |
|

Forum Posts: 59 | Comment #48 by Ostrowski Friday, July 13, 2012 @ 12:38:08 AM | |
| battlefield is good I just hate the gb's worth of updates |
|

Forum Posts: 313 | Comment #49 by Bohemian Friday, July 13, 2012 @ 02:00:27 AM | |
| i still don't know if i want to buy the premium, i like the DLC for the achievements and don't know if the last 2 dlcs will have them. |
|

Forum Posts: 202 | Comment #50 by Sanchezz4387 Friday, July 13, 2012 @ 02:31:16 AM | |
| Bad company is by far the superior online console version of battlefield. BF3 is fucked beyond belief |
|

Forum Posts: 325 | Comment #51 by namepending Friday, July 13, 2012 @ 06:55:58 AM | |
| #47 and #44 no matter how much realism they boast people like you guys need to take it with a grain of salt, it is a video game, no matter what, it will never be "realistic" because you do things like respawn, fight over some FLAGS for no reason whatsoever, I enjoy battlefield as one of my favorite online games but people who don't wanna play it because it's not realistic is just ruining it for themselves because you aren't gonna find a game that's realistic. Deal with it... |
|

Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #52 by Tuck Norris 85 Saturday, July 14, 2012 @ 03:19:08 AM | |
| I really need to get the premium pass. |
|

Forum Posts: 765 | Comment #53 by Lord of Fate Sunday, July 15, 2012 @ 03:21:56 AM | |
| Can't wait for this. A whole DLC dedicated (mostly) to the only thing I own at in this game=tanks! |
|

Forum Posts: 46 | Comment #54 by bio187 Sunday, July 15, 2012 @ 04:51:29 PM | |
@51 Arma, and americas army :) |
|