 | Comment #1 by JakofAllAces
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 01:47:50 PM
sounds great but i hope it isnt a flop like COD3 |
|
 | Comment #2 by TheColdWolf
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 01:48:11 PM
Cool but i hope its before Christmas though so i can get it:) |
|
 | Comment #3 by MEA7HOOK
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 01:48:39 PM
^Agreed. I would like to see Treyarch bow out of the COD series, but I still have hopes that it'll be a good game. |
|
 | Comment #4 by k1ckasskid
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 01:48:46 PM
i refresshed the page then i saw this so i thought id take look i cant w8 4 cod5 its going to be so much fun |
|
 | Comment #5 by xgonscm2
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 01:49:54 PM
blah |
|
 | Comment #6 by Mikeyt086
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 01:50:29 PM
It should be out in Novemeber right? COD games are always released in November.
Im skeptical, but ill give it a shot. Im kind of sick of WW2 games, half the reason of the success of COD4 is that it broke the mould and did an up-to-date game, the other half was the sheer awesomeness. I would be happy if they kept the sheer awesomeness half for COD5. |
|
 | Comment #7 by H3ADHUNTER2K7
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 01:54:41 PM
why are they going back to ww2 there is nothing that cod5 is gona do that hasnt already been done.lets hope they prove me wrong... |
|
 | Comment #8 by Fryza
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 01:54:53 PM
Another World War Two game? Gonna just avoid this one. |
|
| Comment #9 by DJDarkcore
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 01:55:22 PM
wow just wow |
|
 | Comment #10 by IanAHD
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 01:56:34 PM
I'm a little concerned of this since cod3 was weak compared to 2 an 4 it wasn't as intense and challenging, but never the less I'm still getting it cod games have been really fun never know Treyarch mite bring out all the stops with this and surprise everyone |
|
 | Comment #11 by The Nick316
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 01:56:57 PM
Yeah im a bit skeptical about this. Im not too sure about treyarch doing this after the amazing job that infinity ward did. I'm willing to give it a try if they can prove it will be as good if not better than cod4. (even though that will be fucking hard to do.) |
|
 | Comment #12 by voorhees88
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 02:02:15 PM
it's cod, it'll be good no matter where it's set, besides, there's never been a good game about the pacific theatre of war. |
|
 | Comment #13 by Sk8er_0208
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 02:04:06 PM
Make a WWI game stop the WWII stuff please!!! Only thing i've seen in a game that was close to WWI, was in the darkness and eventhen it was twisted. There is game coming out which is WWI though called 'the war to end' or somthink like that.... That was kinder off topic oh well weeeeeeeeeeeeeee! Spam!!! |
|
 | Comment #14 by FeatheryPizza
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 02:04:23 PM
I hope theres online achievements this time... |
|
 | Comment #15 by James03
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 02:05:24 PM
At least this Call of Duty has a 2 year development cycle rather than only 1 year like Call of Duty 3; if that was developed with the same amount of time number 2 was then I'm sure it would have been a much better game. Here's hoping this one will be. >_ |
|
 | Comment #16 by III Curtis III
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 02:08:02 PM
i hopoe theres no online achievements actually because it makes the game have reason to play the game for fun and not say go a match with say atleast 1 headshot and survive the match it would just ruin if you get where im coming from |
|
 | Comment #17 by Jahmuz
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 02:08:15 PM
I prefer COD 3 to 4 so I'm stupidly excited for this, more than I was for 4. For me, COD 4 didn't have the same 'Wow' factor than 2 and 3. I loved Treyarch's multiplayer ideas, and having the 4 player split screen on live option is what makes it better.
Sorry guys, but COD 4 (in my opinion) didn't do it for me. |
|
 | Comment #18 by piez
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 02:20:35 PM
Gee...I'm so...excited...Activision did such a 'great' job with Call of Duty 3...if was so much fun...yeah... |
|
 | Comment #19 by tpb
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 02:21:34 PM
im just fed up of WW2 shooters... We are fed like 3 a year... think of something else! At least COD4 had some modern stuff and variety of characters. |
|
| Comment #20 by Screwface89
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 02:24:06 PM
I'm excited about this one just hope it is as gripping as 4 was for me as i spent a good percentage of this year playing it (only got 360 for christmas) i say keep the rank system and ONLINE ACHIEVEMENTS PLEASE. |
|
 | Comment #21 by stave000
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 02:30:28 PM
Why did they leave modern warfare... stupid Treyarch they better not suck like they did on COD 3 |
|
 | Comment #22 by gameaddict
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 02:36:56 PM
For the people that didn't like CoD3, Treyarch also made CoD:UO one of the better if not the best CoD game(expansion). |
|
 | Comment #23 by Shipley0110
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 02:38:18 PM
Sounds like I'm one of the few who actually enjoyed playing COD3. The campaign was a little weak but I really enjoyed the online multiplayer.
Thought COD4 was ok, the graphics were absolutley mind blowing, but it got a bit stale for me. |
|
 | Comment #24 by cool4joe
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 02:47:56 PM
Another group of posts with people complaining about CoD3 and CoD5? OH MY GOD! Yeah that is what everyone sounds like when they complain. At least they are doing something different and won't stick to mainly just the European Theater. Who knows maybe they will actually put some multiplayer achievements and make me play it more than CoD4. |
|
 | Comment #25 by knockton55
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 02:50:58 PM
As long as it dosent flop :) |
|
 | Comment #26 by SK Beans
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 03:01:05 PM
GTFO TREYARCH! COD3 SUCKED! |
|
 | Comment #27 by eXtreme 1138
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 03:02:33 PM
You seem like an intelligent man, SK Beans.
I'm willing to give this a shot as I enjoyed COD3, and I read the preview in OXM, it looks sweet.
THERE'S FLAMETHROWERS!
With that said, bring it on! |
|
 | Comment #28 by boofarama
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 03:04:59 PM
i love the call of duty series this one sounds different and a lot better. |
|
 | Comment #29 by Hells Zargon
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 03:12:41 PM
I still don't know. Going back to WWII could be great, or it could just be being lazy. |
|
 | Comment #30 by SolvingJunk
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 03:19:03 PM
I think it will probably be garbage. I heard it is being made by the same people who did COD3 and that was the biggest wast of disk space of all WWII games ever. Maybe they will do better this time around. Hopefully that don't try to put in vehicles this time. |
|
 | Comment #31 by SaMoRgAn
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 03:21:26 PM
im not really waiting for this game as its made by the cod3 makers. cod 3 was a flop. waiting for cod6, back to infinity ward babey |
|
 | Comment #32 by Bear
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 03:27:39 PM
what is wrong with cod 3 it was way better than cod 2 in both single player and online and the graphics are way better on cod 3 |
|
 | Comment #33 by AncientSymphony
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 03:29:57 PM
I swear I read somewhere it was going to be coop. |
|
 | Comment #34 by McBride96
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 03:36:52 PM
sucks ass, 2 n 3 sucked then modern warfare got me hooked but going back to WW2 is a v bad idea |
|
 | Comment #35 by ArmyOfPie
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 03:45:57 PM
Cool, sounds good to me. |
|
 | Comment #36 by ZhaoSuKe
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 03:55:53 PM
Snore of duty, CARRY ON WITH MODERN WARFARE |
|
 | Comment #37 by N00B EATA
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 03:56:56 PM
NOOOO I agree with ^^ STICK WITH MODERN WARFARE!!! FUCK WWII had enough of that with the first 3 COD!! |
|
 | Comment #38 by ClutchPapi34
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 04:24:45 PM
If it was IW, I would buy it. I think I'll pass. |
|
 | Comment #39 by rickyfeeney
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 04:41:38 PM
i dont care where its set as long as its a good game. and what was wrong with cod 3 it had great maps great selections online the story was not as good as 2 but still it was a great game |
|
 | Comment #40 by Honkymagoo
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 04:45:40 PM
It's way too soon for another COD game. I'm still in love with the COD4 multiplayer and will still be playing it for a long time. I don't need a new COD game and I think putting it out so soon is going to bite them in the ass. |
|
 | Comment #41 by Mister Spraggsy
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 04:49:23 PM
The reason i liked COD 4 so much was becouse of playing as the SAS. have to wait and see what 5 adds |
|
 | Comment #42 by Carlos123977
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 05:41:20 PM
Please no online achievements. |
|
| Comment #43 by Carlos123977
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 05:47:29 PM
Flamethowers? Cool, no more campers. |
|
 | Comment #44 by CloseChief
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 06:04:57 PM
man, this is cool. but i wish that they would of made another modern game, or even future game. |
|
 | Comment #45 by chiefgonebad
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 06:50:10 PM
ahhhhhhh not more ww2 |
|
| Comment #46 by Jackel2556
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 06:54:56 PM
WWII again? why would they go back? also is it infinity ward this time? |
|
 | Comment #47 by Anthony 644
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 @ 10:08:23 PM
cod 3 was alright best ww2 game was brothers in arms |
|
 | Comment #48 by Zoc
Wednesday, June 18, 2008 @ 12:27:55 AM
people will buy/rent cod 5,they will see it sucks, and a week later, everyone will be back to cod 4 |
|
 | Comment #49 by Da_moopintot
Wednesday, June 18, 2008 @ 04:20:44 AM
well it sucks that treyarch is making it.
but it its cool that theyre going back to world war 2, so they can make a truly next gen world war 2 game. (although cod2 was amazing, its graphics and physics were weak compared to stuff now)
and maybe treyarch will learn from their mistakes in cod3 and make it not suck balls. |
|
 | Comment #50 by eddie_cheeseman
Wednesday, June 18, 2008 @ 08:51:18 AM
Fuck that the only game i'll be playing when it comes out is Deadliest catch: Alaskan storm! fuck yea baby!!!
|
|
 | Comment #51 by Blade564
Wednesday, June 18, 2008 @ 04:08:00 PM
I agree with some people saying that there are enough WWII games out already, we don't need more. But I am looking foward to it because I do like WWII games, I'm just saying that there are too many right now. This game from what I have seen and heard seems like it will be a really good game. |
|
