Forum Posts: 2289 | Comment #1 by Daiphyer. Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:15:12 AM | |
| Strap it on? |
|
Forum Posts: 228 | Comment #2 by the action frampton Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:18:20 AM | |
| Was this supposed to be included in the Season Pass? If so I would be pissed. |
|
Forum Posts: 30 | Comment #3 by Ereaser NL Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:18:36 AM | |
| SR4 april next year? |
|
Forum Posts: 9 | Comment #4 by DJSambob Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:18:43 AM | |
| No. Fuck sake. I was really looking forward to messing around in Steelport with 'freakin super powers' at the end of this year, but not anymore. I'm all for SR4, but after the let downs which were the add ons for SR3, I wanted an expansion worthwhile. |
|
Forum Posts: 169 | Comment #5 by Arron114 Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:19:19 AM | |
"When it comes to Saints Row, it's clear our fans want bigger, better....
Im guessing they didn't factor that when they brought out the 3 dlc packs and that waste of time season pass.
personally wanted this to come out as I really enjoyed STT. Bring on next April I guess. |
|
Forum Posts: 44 | Comment #6 by Serpream Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:21:53 AM | |
| SOOOO The Season pass has been one big scam? First none of the actualy item DLC was included. Now we get a entire DLC removed but i bet they still count it as one of the'intended' DLC's... Will not be getting a season pass for saints row again. |
|
Forum Posts: 787 | Comment #7 by XxStuartxX 1990 Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:22:15 AM | |
I felt raped, when I bought The Third and the season pass.....
So I'll be holding off on the fourth until either a price drop or some good reviews, and i don't usually care much for reviews as it the users opinion that matters. |
|
Forum Posts: 38 | Comment #8 by Aussie27Legend Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:22:51 AM | |
| Whilst I'm sad this won't be coming this year, if they could base the whole next game around that same premise it may be the best game ever made. |
|
Forum Posts: 2 | Comment #9 by Damodar Thade Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:26:15 AM | |
| Talk about repeatedly kicking season pass payers in the nuts. THQ needs to work on customer relations. |
|
Forum Posts: 52 | Comment #10 by JoeyStone Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:27:36 AM | |
| Yeeeeah, I'm sure this has nothing to do with the financial problems the company is having at all. |
|
Forum Posts: 178 | Comment #11 by O0mix0O Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:31:32 AM | |
| Update the leaderboards. |
|
Forum Posts: 251 | Comment #12 by Fang Foom Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:35:19 AM | |
Everyones talking about Season Passes but isn't this stand alone content?
I pre-ordered it from Shopto as a disc!
|
|
Forum Posts: 524 | Comment #13 by jd070993 Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:35:42 AM | |
This DLC was never intended for the Season Pass. In fact, the only way you could have got this expansion was at retail. However, I do agree that the Season Pass was a waste of money for the content you did get.
Roll on SR4 then. |
|
Forum Posts: 370 | Comment #14 by PhantomNemesis Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:37:57 AM | |
| Season Pass was a bit of a waste, but this was never part of it, at least read what you're paying for when you are laying down $20 or whatever it costed. I'd rather have SR4 anyway, and its going to be included in that so no need to complain. |
|
Forum Posts: 8 | Comment #15 by ShotyMcFat Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:40:36 AM | |
@#9,#6,#2 You all do realise Enter the Dominatrix was never apart of the season pass
Here's the description of the Season Pass
"Saints Row: The Third Season Pass includes the listed game content at a discounted rate over individual purchases. If you own this Season Pass all content should be accessed through the in-game store AND NOT DOWNLOADED from Xbox LIVE Marketplace or you will be charged twice. Nyte Blayde Pack, Genkibowl VII, Gangstas in Space, The Trouble With Clones. Saints Row: The Third game required; sold separately"
As you can see it clearly doesn't say its part of the season pass. |
|
Forum Posts: 1770 | Comment #16 by cheevo360 Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:42:36 AM | |
| That make sense and they have more time with Saints Row series so I am happy SR4 coming rather then large expansion. :):) |
|
Forum Posts: 1295 | Comment #17 by UberPirateNinja Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:42:39 AM | |
| I'll buy it pre-owned, fuck off THQ. |
|
Forum Posts: 7 | Comment #18 by creaper210 Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:43:09 AM | |
I really don't like this new take on Saints Row. I never played Saints Row or Saints Row 2 because it was over-the-top. I played it because it had a nice mix between arcade and realism. The game was fun, but could still get serious in the appropriate moments(carlos' death?). Unlike in SR3 where they kill off the main character in the first 15 minutes(off-screen too) like it's no big deal.
I just wanted to say that because of his comment, "When it comes to Saints Row, it's clear our fans want bigger, better, and even more over the top". I never asked for that. I see more people asking for a better story. Some mission/cutscene replay. Better customization. Not a dildo or some stupid fart in a jar. |
|
Forum Posts: 38 | Comment #19 by Aussie27Legend Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:43:26 AM | |
| For all those complaining about the season pass, you do realise this wasn't covered by that right? |
|
Forum Posts: 6 | Comment #20 by Xerany Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:43:29 AM | |
| @ #1 Stick it in, maybe? |
|
Forum Posts: 152 | Comment #21 by skaghead Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:49:52 AM | |
Most people did read what would come with the season pass, the problem was people expected more than 30 minutes worth of play from a piece of DLC .
What we should be worrying about is SR4 , will it be this stand alone expansion with a few extra missions boxed up and sold at full price
THQ have certainly soured the experience of season passes for many peoples a I can see this having a negative impact on sales for the SR series |
|
Forum Posts: 1016 | Comment #22 by The Bum-Mobile Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 07:01:45 AM | |
| Not a huge Saints Row guy, but that's a great name for the DLC. |
|
Forum Posts: 4147 | Comment #23 by evokazz Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 07:02:52 AM | |
TAKE MY MONEY PLZ!! |
|
Forum Posts: 32 | Comment #24 by streetunderpt Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 07:09:24 AM | |
| TAKE ALL OF MONEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
Forum Posts: 389 | Comment #25 by E10phoenix Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 07:23:02 AM | |
| Err sorry, saints row 3 was a bit of a disappointment. Hopefully sr4 will be better as i was a huge fan of the previous two games |
|
Forum Posts: 25 | Comment #26 by DarthTrakd Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 07:31:42 AM | |
| It wasn't DLC it was a stand-alone disc based game. kind of like DR2: off the record, technically it's just a different take on the same game and it would be cheaper that a full new game because much of the groundwork has already been laid out. |
|
Forum Posts: 1 | Comment #27 by janosandsereth Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 07:32:11 AM | |
| not surprised its been shifted into sr4 thq really needs to come up with a hit else the company is in deep trouble a shame really they have come up with good games in the past i feel sorry for the people who work there the pressure must be intense |
|
Forum Posts: 516 | Comment #28 by Mister Spraggsy Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 07:32:31 AM | |
| Feel sorry for those who bought the season pass. I was going to get ut myself but decided I would wait and see what they release. Saved myself some money there. |
|
Forum Posts: 514 | Comment #29 by quidyg Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 07:47:12 AM | |
| I used to love saints row, but after playing the third I'm now gunna just save my money for gta v |
|
Forum Posts: 2308 | Comment #30 by Andreas_loel Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 07:50:49 AM | |
| Preowned it is then THQ :) Im happy i didnt buy neither season pass nor dlc, but why whould i do that for a glitchy game? Go back to Saints 1 style sr2 was good aswell but SR3 was too short and filled with stupid fucking gimmicks |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #31 by Shinclone Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 07:53:07 AM | |
| I don't know why they don't shitcan the whole franchise. It's utter shit that tries waaaaaay too hard to be controversial, not even considering the absolutley fucking awful dlc they crapped out and expected people to pay for. No wonder THQ's going bust. |
|
Forum Posts: 14 | Comment #32 by Rob1610 Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 07:55:56 AM | |
| Meh. Sucks about the supposed add-on, but as long as SR4 is more like SR2 than SRTT, I'll be happy. |
|
Forum Posts: 153 | Comment #33 by Yourburntstar Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 07:56:47 AM | |
| this is a very smart move by THQ, because they know by when Enter the Dominatrix was suppose to come out, everyone will be playing GTA V and Hitman Absolution, Bioshock infinite, CoD Black ops 2, Halo 4, Borderlands 2, they're is a whole slew of games THQ would've had to try and out battle. i'm not saying it wouldnt sell, but it just wouldnt sell like they want it to. So i'm not suprised by them pushing this back, i'm disappointed but not suprised. |
|
Forum Posts: 9 | Comment #34 by Zenka The Myth Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 08:11:53 AM | |
| I feel like I've been hit in the face by a large, throbbing purple dildo. |
|
Forum Posts: 5271 | Comment #35 by iBuzz7S Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 08:14:34 AM | |
Season Pass = at most, 3 hours of additional gameplay. After all that, they decide to release add-ons for clothes and a Penthouse Pack, which I'm sure it sold oh so well. You completed the DLC to find that you can use superpowers only when you are in that particular mission and nowhere else, so they decided to make an entire new thing out of it, by charging the consumer over $20 for it. Mind you, they have IGNORED all of the cries from fans to add some sort of support to re-do missions, similar to SR2.
No sympathy from me. Give and take, in 5 years, THQ will be apart of video game history, lost in debt. |
|
Forum Posts: 3662 | Comment #36 by littlejay Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 08:31:31 AM | |
| silly people fussing about season passes when the pass always tells you exactly what you get. it said nothing about a stand alone expansion you poo poo heads! you can't read a description when you buy something? or do you always assume you get everything ever made for the game instead of saving 800 msp on major dlc releases? |
|
Forum Posts: 251 | Comment #37 by Fang Foom Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 08:33:21 AM | |
| Meh I loved saints Row 3 |
|
Forum Posts: 65 | Comment #38 by BeardedHoplite Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 08:42:49 AM | |
| So they're going even more retard in the fourth one? Maybe it'll actually be good since it'll go beyond Full Retard into normalcy. But SR4 is looking like a skip for me. Bring on GTA V |
|
Forum Posts: 313 | Comment #39 by Rickmassacre Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 08:47:41 AM | |
| "technically legal" LOL |
|
Forum Posts: 63 | Comment #40 by Dlark17 Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 08:50:21 AM | |
Aw maaaaann... I was really looking forward to more this year...
I guess if it picks up the pace and improves on the sequel, I'll trust Volition to make the lightning strike twice! |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #41 by KaptainMorganWo Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 09:12:29 AM | |
| These are some dark days for THQ. I'm not liking their chances of sticking around. |
|
Forum Posts: 1515 | Comment #42 by RDrules Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 09:17:11 AM | |
| @36 I think its more hope for some people that the season pass will kick out some more than it already has It did say what was going to be in it yes but those packs failed to offer anything substantial so people rightfully want a little more for their money. |
|
Forum Posts: 2 | Comment #43 by DannyG92UK Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 09:17:40 AM | |
| I dont see why people are sayin all this bad stuf. the DLC was not great but the main game was fantastic in my opinion. while im a little gutted about this dlc not comin out, im happy theres a saints row 4 comin out and i hope it expands on the awesomeness of SR3 |
|
Forum Posts: 9 | Comment #44 by DJSambob Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 09:23:03 AM | |
| Basically they are renaming Enter The Dominatrix to Saints Row 4 and charging twice the price for it. |
|
Forum Posts: 173 | Comment #45 by Blue Thunder28 Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 09:32:15 AM | |
| No!!!! But at the same time yes!!! |
|
Forum Posts: 463 | Comment #46 by francisrossi Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 09:36:30 AM | |
| So, SR4 will be even shorter than SR3 then? Cheers THQ... |
|
Forum Posts: 17 | Comment #47 by richardwarnercool1 Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 09:46:10 AM | |
| And this is why I just stick with the first game on it's own. More realistic, darker, interesting (without feeling the need to go over the top) and it gives it an awesome ending that is pretty well tied up and doesn't need to be continued. |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #48 by UndeadBearCavalry Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 09:46:34 AM | |
| All the mini-packs of dlc should have been included in the season pass. In my opinion, which I'm sure a lot of people will agree with, the actual mission packs were too short. The best one was Genki Bowl, but who doesn't love Professor Genki? |
|
Forum Posts: 11 | Comment #49 by ian24971 Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 09:52:51 AM | |
| Season Passes = FAIL |
|
Forum Posts: 5 | Comment #50 by HVAC Techie Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 09:57:45 AM | |
| Gah, they can't do anything right. Well I guess SR4 will be in Steelport again, seeing as how this is being included in it. |
|
Forum Posts: 1515 | Comment #51 by RDrules Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 10:18:06 AM | |
@43, dont get me wrong the game is actually a lot of fun, the DLC was also... it was all just too short, compared to the first 2 saints rows the third has hardly any content in it at all, most of the missions were just activities in disguise and the activities had been stripped back to a single level each instance compared to 8 in the first game and 6 in the second and the number of actual missions is half if not less that of SR2.
add to that the linearity of it all, sure theres a couple of choices in the game but only 1 effects anything and you can do it twice to get both sides anyway where in SR1 and 2 you can literally pick and choose what missions to do when
they also stripped most of the customization out of it despite saying there would be more, the character builder was nice but after you started the game the options compared to SR2 were lacking in pretty much every area like in SR2 you could layer up clothes to get a completely unique outfit, in 3 you were stripped of half the options for that and then the houses were all exactly the same compared the the many unique and customization ones in SR2
and Streelport itself was more like still water in SR1, a bland and uninteresting city which after all the improvements SR2 made to stillwater was a real shame.
and the story itself was just bad in comparison, the saints turned from the ruthless gang that we love into a bunch of pussies, the boss would never have stood for any f the crap the syndicate threw at him/her in SR2. where was the sadistic spirit, the crushing people with monster trucks, the tatooing people with nuclear waste, the blowing guitarists hands off with pyrotechnics? In SR2 they killed a gang member he/shed just met and they went on a murderous rampage for revenge, in 3 they killed someone we knew and loved and he/she let most of them go and didnt seem to even care half the time.
It was a fun game just compared to what came before it it was just half assed and for what? to have some stupid childish gimmicks thrown in and to sell a tonne of crap as DLC |
|
Forum Posts: 1178 | Comment #52 by MartyMcFly Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 10:53:35 AM | |
| I'm done with this series. |
|
Forum Posts: 723 | Comment #53 by Axel Desade Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 10:54:03 AM | |
| @51 Very well put. This game was 1 step forward and 50 steps back for the series. |
|
Forum Posts: 183 | Comment #54 by alf hockeyfan Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 11:02:43 AM | |
| Con! |
|
Forum Posts: 134 | Comment #55 by OMGmyFACE Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 11:07:57 AM | |
| SR3 was good but SR2 was great. Loads of costumes and weapons you didn't have to pay $3 each for and the ability to replay missions without starting a new game. Not to mention it wasn't trying WAY too hard to be funny like a long episode of Futurama or something. "Oh, look, zombies. And we're IN the video game?! Autotuned pimp, yo." God, more of that is coming? |
|
Forum Posts: 11 | Comment #56 by jbixler Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 11:36:20 AM | |
| Really upset they cancelled this, was waiting for it to come out to get me hyped for the sequel (not that I already am), just like Case Zero did for Dead Rising 2. Can't wait for Saints Row 4, it'd be nice if they changed the premise of their season pass a bit and make the mission packs a little longer next time. |
|
Forum Posts: 385 | Comment #57 by Bum Commando Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 12:45:06 PM | |
| Goodbye THQ |
|
Forum Posts: 130 | Comment #58 by m-iichel Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 01:20:19 PM | |
| :( was looking really forward to this but sr4 in beginning of 2013.. feels to soon :O |
|
Forum Posts: 25 | Comment #59 by Stepofffoo Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 01:52:42 PM | |
| How bout the next one has to do with Dex screwing you over, following the first 2 games, and not some half-assed sidestory? |
|
Forum Posts: 624 | Comment #60 by Hurricane Of 87 Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 01:56:56 PM | |
It definitely won't be coming out April 2013 as it'll have a more famous open-world title to contend with. Good thing Lee Bradley typed 'after April' and some of you glossed over that. :p
September 2013 at the earliest.
They need to make a city like Stillwater where each segment has it's own character instead of Steelport where it felt like every island had skyscraper, a residential area, port, etc. Plus those bridges felt like they went on forever.
Given THQ's money issues I'm surprised they thought releasing this as a stand alone release would be a good idea. |
|
Forum Posts: 2089 | Comment #61 by mjc0961 Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 01:59:59 PM | |
@18: I couldn't agree more. What worked so well about Saints Row and Saints Row 2 was the wackiness mixed in with the realism. What happened to Shogo in #2 was both over the top and satisfying as you know that would be scary as hell if it actually happened. What happened to Phillipe in #3? Over the top, but also stupid.
I don't want more over the top. I want a better story again. I want activities to not be used as filler missions so the game will seem longer. I want them to stop cutting out content to sell as overpriced DLC packs. And I want the actual mission based DLC they make to be worth the money instead of always being 3 short, boring missions. |
|
Forum Posts: 495 | Comment #62 by AirborneRichard Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 02:39:00 PM | |
I fully played and finished this last SR3 and even i enjoyed it very much when it comes to the graphics and the game-mechanics, i somehow felt dissapointed by the story and the fact that where SR1 & SR2 where about gangs and some over the top gunplay, i kinda missed that in SR3, okay you had a great set of guns that you could upgrade ect, but storywise i def missed thedifferent sets of gangs you had in lets say SR2. I always saw SR as the over the top brother (or sister depends on how you look at it) from GTA, because in SR you could do stuff you coudn,t do in GTA.
I def feel sorry for all that went and bought that season pass, i must admit i was close getting it but somehow i start thinking i might be better off just buy the stuff i realy want lose instead, as it turned out not a bad choice.
Hopefully in SR4 they go back to the roots of SR2 or SR1 and incorperate a better story and just gangwars instead of zombies and mutated superfreaks. |
|
Forum Posts: 0 | Comment #63 by asilent boom Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 02:44:59 PM | |
| I enjoyed SR3, but I didn't really like the city it was set in. Only way I buy SR4 is if it's in a new city, but I doubt that will be the case if they are rolling this DLC into the SR4. |
|
Forum Posts: 392 | Comment #64 by tunaleg Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 03:10:20 PM | |
| I'm done with SR. The 3rd was a pile of shit, SR1 though is still one of my all time fave 360 games |
|
Forum Posts: 192 | Comment #65 by DOA_Rose Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 03:46:34 PM | |
Bring back Septic Avenger and Fuzz
Go back to tags & CDs for the collectibles
give us a huge varied map like Stillwater. Steelport had little variety and required looking at the map constantly.
get rid of Snatch & Escort. They weren't fun in the first game, they aren't fun in 3 in any variation....with the possible exception of Tiger Escort
SR2 level soundtrack. 3's wasn't bad, just meh. Though I really only care about the 80's tunes and electronica.
all story missions should be missions, not activities.
Chop Shop should be like in SR2. I'm fucking sick of seeing "the target vehicle has been destroyed" when I AM DRIVING IT AND IT IS PERFECTLY FINE
Don't kill of good characters AT ALL, or at least not off screen 10 minutes in....
DLC mission packs should be substantial and any unique new weapons/vehicles/powers should be unlockable. Also, no more nickel & dime weapon/outfit disc-locked crap. |
|
Forum Posts: 116 | Comment #66 by Marciano 315 Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 03:47:40 PM | |
| well at least i know saints row 4 will be good like saints row 3. i thought saints row 3 was the best of them all by far. i like fun unrealistic games that arent serious. |
|
Forum Posts: 251 | Comment #67 by Fang Foom Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 04:20:02 PM | |
Did no one else find SR1 was just abit too GTA-esque?
Atleast 3 stepped out for its shadows..kinda |
|
Forum Posts: 1515 | Comment #68 by RDrules Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 05:00:52 PM | |
@67, no not really the whole layout of the game play is completely different to GTA.... people just cant see past GTA when its a game with cars and guns
its unfair to the series and to all games like it and to top it off there was multiple games like this before GTA |
|
Forum Posts: 138 | Comment #69 by Rastaman20 Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 05:41:51 PM | |
| Hell yea a Saints 4? Fuck yea I wonder if were Gunn b in steelport or back to still water or a whole new city entirely can't wait |
|
Forum Posts: 463 | Comment #70 by francisrossi Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:03:09 PM | |
| @49 - Nah, they only fail when a company like THQ only includes three shitty add-ons, choosing instead to focus on masses of codes to unlock on-disc stuff. The Forza 4 was fine, for instance. |
|
Forum Posts: 41 | Comment #71 by Tim 13 Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:39:09 PM | |
Do Saints Row 3 again, with a few simple changes:
1) If you bring back invincibility options, add in an option to TOGGLE them on and off.
2) Online multiplayer only two players? Come on. What year are we in? Four players or more online, please.
Other than that, this news is just fine. Just don't get overly ambitious. Don't rush the game, don't half-ass any part of it, I'll be in Gamestop buying it the day of release. |
|
Forum Posts: 17 | Comment #72 by Memento Mori Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 06:40:09 PM | |
| I enjoyed SR, and loved SR2. TT was good fun, but flawed, and the business decision ruined it almost entirely. I'm done with the series, it seems, discontent with both the artistic direction and the money-grabbing ways of THQ and Volition. |
|
Forum Posts: 155 | Comment #73 by Akatsuki Sw1tch Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 08:33:15 PM | |
Hopefully saints row 4 will be more like 2 was with better customization, Bring back the Tags & CD's & let us re-watch the pretty decent cutscenes like you could in 2, Don't force us to do the annoying mini missions either, And cut back on the stupidity a bit, If not i won't even be bothering with 4.
SR3 was my most anticipated game of last year after being a huge SR2 fan but ended up being my biggest disappointment of the year. |
|
Forum Posts: 1515 | Comment #74 by RDrules Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 08:51:50 PM | |
@71, the multiplayer was just right... or would have been if it wasent for the silly "whored mode"
just because you can have stupid amount of people on a multiplayer game now doenst mean you should, a game like this doesnt need it... |
|
Forum Posts: 475 | Comment #75 by BackerMan Wednesday, June 20, 2012 @ 10:56:20 PM | |
| LOOKS LIKE I SPENT SEASON PASS FOR NOTHING... |
|
Forum Posts: 1012 | Comment #76 by Magicman10893 Thursday, June 21, 2012 @ 05:06:30 AM | |
@75
I suppose we are both late to the Season Pass discussion. You should have known that the Season Pass was for nothing when the little $3 packs weren't included and when the last DLC that the Season Pass covered was released.
It clearly stated in the Season Pass that the only things in it were the Nyteblade Pack, Genki Bowl, Gangstas in Space and Trouble with the Clones. This EXPANSION (not DLC, a standalone expansion that was to be bought in stores on a disc) was never included in the Season Pass. This is something you would know if you read the comments, this has only been mentioned about 10 times already. |
|
Forum Posts: 41 | Comment #77 by Tim 13 Thursday, June 21, 2012 @ 05:42:37 PM | |
| 74: Oh, okay. So four of my friends own this game and will play it at any given time, and you think it's cool, these days, to have to pick one to play with? I'm not talking about city-wide chaos like in GTA4, those modes are fucking stupid. But to be able to have more than two players in one match was even implied by THQ themselves after SR2 was released. If I want to hang out with two or three friends in a game, that's not a far-fetched concept, nor does it ruin the essence of the game. Don't be a troll. |
|
Forum Posts: 1515 | Comment #78 by RDrules Friday, June 22, 2012 @ 08:28:30 AM | |
@77its not far fetched no but its not completely practical either adding co op to a game isnt just as simple as allowing another person to join and the more people you add the more difficult it is to get right
the Dev cant just decide "well to make sure everyones happy lets just make it so any number of people can join a world and do what they want" they have to make sure the games still fun and ultimately playable with more people in it
In a game like this every extra person you have playing effectively doubles the load that the servers and consoles have to deal with for starters, since each player can wonder anywhere in the city an extra set of entities has to be spawned there, then every action taken is doubled and every fight they get in has to show on both consoles aswell.. then theres the fact that this game is full co op so all missions need to be balanced so that they arent stupidly easy with 4 players yet arent too hard with 1
what they provided was a fun co op mode that works its not an issue at all |
|
Forum Posts: 6 | Comment #79 by Akira_Katayama Friday, September 07, 2012 @ 03:42:38 AM | |
| Pissed that this was cancelled, but with any luck they'll be able to expand it into SR4 and make the game more awesome.. but to be honest, I want them to re-incorporate the balance of goofiness and drama like they did in SR2... and bring back Septic Avenger and Crowd Control. those were awesome. An expanded Guardian Angel, and the dumping of Mayhem or Tank Mayhem would also be appreciated. |
|
Forum Posts: 3 | Comment #80 by Mike McBob 2323 Monday, November 05, 2012 @ 07:07:54 PM | |
| Lame sauce |
|
