What would you rather have...

[lid]

Let's say you had a choice between two gamercards, both with the same gamertag, settings, etc. One has 50,000 gamerscore, with a full 1000 in every game, and the other has 100,000 gamerscore but the games list is a mess with 0 point arcade titles and such with a little over 300 gamerscore in every game on it.

What would you pick? I'm curious as how completion affects peoples achievement collecting nowadays.

EDIT: Lotsa completionists it seems :|

[Fonkey Monkey]

id rather have 100,000 with a mix amount of maxed scores.
hardcore completionists are a joke imo.

[Randomnutta]

id like to have 50k i dunno i like the idea of having a good number in most of my games to me it makes it more of an achievement..

[jackanape]

Neither, cos I already have over 100k with most of the games at 1k, MWA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!

Though if I had to start again it would be the 50k account for sure, as long as it had some tough games on there - as anyone can get to 50k with 100% completion in easy stuff.

[M85A21]

The 50K account.
Once I hit 100,000 I'm re renting ALL my games and trying to 1000 in all of them.

[JC]

I'd rather have the 50K account...I want to be a completionist. :(

[VeNGeD]

i love gamerscore and i dont care about completion so i'd take the 100k.

[Missis Beki]

I think I'd rather have the 50k all completed, which im trying to work towards now, but i dont see it happening.
I hate leaving games unfinished!

[newbsicle]

Completion is important to me for it shows I'm dedicated to every game and not just a gamerscore. Virtually nobody notices this so really I do it for myself.

[Z3R0 S1X]

I'll take the 50k card with mostly everything complete even though 100k is very impressive in its own right. In my opinion, completion precentage does count for something because it shows that you took the time to complete the game fully (or close to it). I know you can get to 50k on alot of easy games, but a completion precentage in the 90% plus range without cheating is really good. But thats just what I think.

[Iank1987]

I would hav 2 take th 50k card as anyone can get 100k if their total possible score is over 200k

I've only got just over 80% completion right now but Im going for 90% before i reach 50k

[spankyNspronkle]

id take the 100K ... there are just some games i will never 1000 and i do enjoy them (Rock Band... i cant do drums on expert that well) and i dont see a point in not playing them just to have a perfect gamerscore

[SooperSmurph]

I'd rather have the 50 bucks they paid for it instead of someone else's gamer account. It'd feel cheap, dirty.

[Hammer 5O2]

The 50K account.
Once I hit 100,000 I'm re renting ALL my games and trying to 1000 in all of them.
thats what i intend on doing. my completion is not great but i know on many of the games i have i could finish the majority of them up with a little more dedication to completion.

[antnie]

I would rather be like Blackjaw.:p The god of completion.

[lid]

I would rather be like Blackjaw.:p The god of completion.

Naw, My vote for gods of completion are Sajaa and oOEvilOo x360a. Both Legit. Sorry, but Blackjaw has the tendency to be full of himself and he pisses me off ever so much.

[I King Pin 0]

I would much rather have just the 100k account because you do not have many people with that amount as around the 50k mark. I only check and care about what people's overall gamerscore is, not what they have played or completed.

[Blind x360a]

Naw, My vote for gods of completion are Sajaa and oOEvilOo x360a. Both Legit. Sorry, but Blackjaw has the tendency to be full of himself and he pisses me off ever so much.

Evil has glitched games...

[lid]

Evil has glitched games...

what!? How so?

[Chris PW]

100k. I would hate to try and keep the rep of completing every game I would play with the 50k GT.

[Innsomnni]

100k, i like working on games trying to get all the achievements on the game, but i wouldnt like it already done for me, so ya that one.

[White Lama]

Easy.

I would like the 50 000 one, I hade uncompleted games and especially hate that you can't remove them from you games list.

Damn PGR 3 and DOA 4.

[Chaosflare]

Gotta go with the 50k. This way, you get a good 50+ games out of the way, and then leave space for games you'd like to play and complete.

I too hate having games on my list that I'll never complete. MLB2k6 for one, as I had to return it, and never plan on getting it again. Plus, I don't have the money to spend on renting games.

[zI Beef Iz]

100K. I don't care about getting 1000/1000, as I haven't got the time or the patience to achieve the time consuming ones. I like to get at least 500 on each game, but it's no big deal to me having games with a low gamerscore on my profile. I do however think there should be an option to hide the 0/1000G ones, or delete them from your account altogether. I just want a high gamerscore, doesn't matter to me how many games I have to play to get it. :p

[Blue Radium]

The 50k account, as the achievements in that one are probably much harder to obtain, while the 100k account stuck to only the easy achievements.

[naptownsteeler]

The 50k account, as the achievements in that one are probably much harder to obtain, while the 100k account stuck to only the easy achievements.

The 100k as long as the ones that aren't closed atleast have the multiplayer achievements done. That way I can finish them when I want to.

Also not every 100k account plays nothing but easy games.;)

[Deadly Moves]

I think i'd rather have the 100k... Most people just look at your total, anyway...

Personally, if you have 1000 from every game you kinda look abit sad IMO

PS - lid, you should add a poll, so we can easily see the results.

[Cause]

I rather have the 100,000 and this is the reason behind it. Think about it, Ok fine congrats on 1000 quake 4 (almost impossible) but anyways if this was really your account think of all the time it took you to achieve that goal. You could be playing some of the best games out on this system and then wouldn't take half the time it took you to get the full 1000 im quake. Completion of a game is pretty important but, achievements that take around 30 hours to complete is a little ridiculous.

Sure with the 100k i only got around 300 in ever game but at least i got to experience everything xbox 360 has to offer. Not just stuck in the same game forever.

A little too detailed but ya see what i mean :woop:

[o0EVIL0o x360a]

Sorry Lid, I had a moment of weakness and did the Seriously glitch cause I got sick of boosting that game. Also got Elite on Vegas 1 with the same trick. I kinda wish I hadn't but at the same time, boosting MP achievements doesn't prove anything. I've got 1K in Lost Planet and both FEAR games which takes a great deal of skill. Someone who sits around boosting for Seriously doesn't get any respect for it. I just wanted to sell the two games so there ya go.

I never go around bragging about it or anything, but I did it and it's done. MP achievements are a joke anyways. lol Achievement matches and rubberband boosting would've been pointless and no more "legit". Anyways, that was a long time ago. Gears and Vegas are already two of my top played games at more than 50 days apiece according to 360voice.

[SoaringEagle]

50K only cuz i like a high achs%. it shows dedication rather than just flashing $ to rent and buy games to blast through the easy 400 that every game has.

my opinion here, thats all

[negitorotemaki1]

Definitely the mix. I'd rather play more games than play each one perfectly.

[FirstSpartanZP]

I would pick 100 becouse It would be fun to work on every game.

[JJBDude]

Depends if the 50k had lots of hard games in their instead of easy 1000's, would rather have 100k with all hard games at 300 than 50k with easy 1000's.

[Keano]

Well if I was offfered then niether because the gamerscore wouldn't be my own. If it's a choice between what I would prefer to achieve I would say 100k. I don't really care about 100% completion and having a 100k gamerscore would look pretty good.

The honest truth is that niether will ever happen because I give up on getting achievements too easily and I just prefer to play the game for fun.

[Tdlob]

definately the 50K I just cant stand to see a game go unfinished...

[expiredscotty93]

i would take the 50k one because say you have played 50 games and you have 50k you will look good but also a freak at the same time

http://card.mygamercard.net/h2o/diamond/expiredscotty93.png (http://profile.mygamercard.net/expiredscotty93)

[uegstevie]

id hhave the 50k 1 cus if u had the 100k 1 people would expect u to be realy good at the games u got
:Bounce:

[The REAL LegacY]

50k because takes skill to get to 50k with perfects

[Axe Argonian]

50K. I like getting 80% or higher in my games.

[Xx G3D xX]

50 k cause i like every thing as neat as possible :p

[Pashos]

I would have the 50k. Anyone can get 100k with 300+ games played but it takes a lot of skill to get 50k with less than 60 games played.

[N3R0 X360a]

50k Because It's cool to have in your sig 100% = (name all the games here)

[sports_guy212]

50k, completing games and all their achievements are much more rewarding for me personally

[StolenKyle/]

100k easily because, sure having 100% completion is good, but as soon as you rent or buy another game you will have a lot of stress on your self keeping that 100% up.

[omg itz nojer]

Compltionist

But then again 100k gamerscore you could do the achievements on the games with little score and get more than 100k

but the 50k with all 100% sounds mint

[Ben is a Ninja]

The 50k one. The 100k one seems really sad to me, people wasting money just to get little bits of easy gamerscore.

[o0 TommyGuns 0o]

id rather have the 50k one

[Chada Darkmane]

The 50k card is tempting but I would probably go for the 100k card. I would rather have enjoyed playing 100+ games and quit them before they started to piss me off too much, than have only played 50 games and possibly have spent ages trying to get the last few acheivements of the game well after i had had an absolute guts full of it.

My gamercard is a mess right now with arcade demos and 0gs retail games all over it but thats how i like it, a true and acurate record of how i like to play games.

[androsmere]

I'm a completionist myself. I don't care so much about the total score - I get more pride and satisfaction from getting the full 1000. So I would rather have the 50k account.

[Y0UNGERKILLER]

100k for defo

[chucky0177]

I would rather have the 100k, and have enjoyed playing them instead of stressing about getting the full 1000 for a game

[M85A21]

Sorry Lid, I had a moment of weakness and did the Seriously glitch cause I got sick of boosting that game. Also got Elite on Vegas 1 with the same trick. I kinda wish I hadn't but at the same time, boosting MP achievements doesn't prove anything. I've got 1K in Lost Planet and both FEAR games which takes a great deal of skill. Someone who sits around boosting for Seriously doesn't get any respect for it. I just wanted to sell the two games so there ya go.

I never go around bragging about it or anything, but I did it and it's done. MP achievements are a joke anyways. lol Achievement matches and rubberband boosting would've been pointless and no more "legit". Anyways, that was a long time ago. Gears and Vegas are already two of my top played games at more than 50 days apiece according to 360voice.

Well it's not that big a deal, I would have done the same thing if I hadn't of loved GoW so much, so don't sweat it Chris.

[jukkakhan]

50K. If it's a good game, I don't mind sinking hours into it to explore, get achievements, and just enjoy it. Besides, if my gamercard is full of easy points and quickies, I wouldn't feel like I accomplished anything.

[Shinchib]

Obviously this is figuratively speaking because I would never spend money or even accept a gamertag that isn't my own. I would choose the 50,000 point one. I'm a big fan of completeness.

[Ephajim]

50K, for simple reasons already stated a few times above me :)

[Royle]

I would rather have 50k with 1000 in all my games simply because I would love to have a good completionist rating.

[lip splitter]

I would take the 100000. Once I beat a game I am done with it. I do npt have hours to play so just finishing a game in a month is a huge win for me.

[mmz41]

50k no doubt.

[Lotto1215]

id rather have the account with 100k

[MegaSparten360]

i would have the 50,000 i hate not having all the acheviment in my games

[master_shake_350]

I would take the incomplete one because I don't really care about the percentage.

But I would have at least 500 gs in each game instead of 300gs!

[Gohan Reborn]

I'd take the 100k. As much as I consider myself a perfectionist, and the sense of pride getting that complete 1000 can feel, I would rather have more games played. I disagree with people renting or buying games JUST for the easy 1k (King Kong, CSI and avatar ftl?) so if I were to get 50k and mostly perfects, they would have to be games that I play because I wanted to play.

[Cacky]

50K. Completing games 1000/1000 makes you feel proud.

[OverkillChaos]

cant we settle on a 75k lol I am a hardcore completionist so Id choose 50k

[miguel56]

the 50 000 account for sure

[InDeathsWake]

50k account would be nice

[Vertigod]

If you'd asked me a few months ago, I would have gone with the 100k account, but recently I've become more of a completionist, so the 50k account is more appealing to me now. I like the idea of a gamercard with a lot of 1000/1000's, but like some have said earlier, it's more of a personal thing, as most people just care about your overall GS and not how you arrived at it.

[CrumblyWarrior]

the 50K the having accessto hundreds of titles and only playing them for REALLY easy acheivments is not really respectable not saying you have to have 1000 but just grabing the first 300 the game throws you in the first 5 minutes

[dakisbac]

I'd rather have the 50k tag

[uyo80]

50,000 because peole would say wow hes good than saying he just palys alot of games

[XXU]

100,000 gs for sure m8

[Eternal]

I'd take the 50k with a really high completion percentage.

[Blackjaw x]

Naw, My vote for gods of completion are Sajaa and oOEvilOo x360a. Both Legit. Sorry, but Blackjaw has the tendency to be full of himself and he pisses me off ever so much.

Oopsie daisies. Sorry, I didn't know I could piss people off that I'd never even met. I must be a fucking prick.

I'm actually not full of myself at all, in fact I'm really surprised I was brought up in a thread and mentioned with some of these other people. I don't give a shit what other people see my gamerscore/completion as, and even asked to be removed from MGC... but yeah, full of myself. I'm actually very self-conscious about how underweight I am, this concave chest disorder thing I have, a pretty big nose... and I can't sing very well. Oh yeah, I also have a hard time keeping a girlfriend because I always "talk about unimportant things" (philosophy, life, you know). And yeah, Evil cheated a few games, but it's cool he's a good guy.

Let me know if I can do anything to un-piss you off (ever so much).

[AchieveOrLeave]

i would go wit the 50k shows that you completed the whole game and not just some of it...

[SHA0L1NSTYL3]

50K 100% Completed any day

[T SPARR]

I would totally go with the 50k. It just bugs me to see all those games on their. It bugs me even more when people have the 0 pt. games and don't delete them.

[KFZ Scrubs]

I'd want the 100k because i don't give a damn about completion.

[MetalMike 420]

Yea, i'd take the 100k , with all the games a little over 300.....obviously...

then i would jack all 333 games up to 1k and achieve 1m gs , muhaha

[dontcountstars]

Oh I would no question rather have the 50k with the 100% completion rate. As other people have said, with things like Gamefly and such it is all too easy to build up a really high gamerscore simply by playing easy games a few hours each, for me the true test of a gamer is someone who completely owns the game and gets that 100%.
Saying that, my own gamercard needs a LOT of work doing to even get near to 100% complete - and with the lovely EA gift of NFS Carbon, I will never be able to properly achieve it *Sad face*

[Rockstar92]

50k. Cheaper.

[x6xDamonx6x]

50K. I prefer the 1000GS.

[EpicGinge]

I would rather have the 100k because if I had the games I would work on them to get a better completion rate.

[PHIL 421]

100k so I could work up the completion rate. It isn't very fun having all your games at 100%. There's no reason to play them. I prefer unlocking them myself there's no fun in letting someone else do it for you.

[Jedi ObiJoe]

Tough question. I've been working hard to keep my completion percentage up but 100K would be nice. I'd take the 100K (300 points on most games can be increased with ease), delete the 0's, then start completing the games.

[Defcizion]

Probably the 50k

[alexandr4872]

Of course the 100k one. To me it's mainly how big your gamer score is, I really don't care that much about the game competition %.

[hondafanatic17]

The 100k, think about it you would have all them arcade games to play and beat and all the reg games to play too. Why would I want one that already has all the games completed.

[berserkerninja]

I'll take the 50k pl0x.

Anyways if i had the 100k i would just delete all the zero point games XD

[Hi im Klima]

i would take the 100k one.

[xICooRsYIx]

I would definatly choose the 100,000 gamerpoints with incomplete games. I dont care for completeing games, i just love getting achievements and building my gamerscore. Completing games definately helps, but i dont see the need to have 100% completion

xICooRsYIx

[Rugger X]

Could I take the 100K and then just start renting the games and finishing them up? If so I would take that for sure.

[eskEMO]

100k. :) Then I'd go back and work on games.

[vI-Youneek-Iv]

I'd go with the 100,000 one with 0's and not completed titles for a reason.
1. You can delete the Zeros and 2. I don't mind having 300/1000 as long as you have some right.

[vI-Youneek-Iv]

Plus my goal is to hit 100,000 A.S.A.P before MW 2 comes out. Just like I did with MW 1 I stopped getting achievements for like months. When I hit 10th I said I'm done but they came out with a map pack.....

[Kunduz]

I'd go for the one with 100,000 gs, just because it means I've own more games.

[dzstarr6668]

u know that is a tough question. i would probably take 100k, with all the holes. my completed game ratio is pretty all over the place anyway.

[frank9080]

As long as the 50k has these tough games I have completed I will take that. You know like my 1K In Guitar Hero 2, Beijing 08 (still only 131 people in the world with 1K), Tony Hawk's Project 8, and Gears of War.

[Ap3 Juice]

50,000 all 1,000, 100% completion is amazing.

[cheeky 315]

i'd rather have the 50k one too

i hate untidy gamercards and i hate it when i start a game cant get into it and only unlock a couple of achievments for 30 odd gamerscore

i've got 23 games on my gamercard which works out i averidge around 715 gs per game which imo aint bad

gamercards are personal they dont really mean anything to anyone else, i would take the lower card with the higher completion rate all day long

[korry135]

the 50k account

[Why Aim]

I would say the 100K account, Most people look at your overall gamerscore so yeah.

[JVViz]

It would make sense to go with the 100k account, but I think I have a minor case of OCD so I'd take the 50k completionist account ;)

[xDamnat10n]

Having an account with a whole bunch of 10s and 25s in each game is why I got rid of my first account! I still have a few games like that on my current account, but thats either because I rented them and had to bring them back without a chance to finish them or because my disc sucks. Completionist for sure. 50k.

[Psycho Chickan]

What are the games? :) The obvious answer is that I'd go niether as I want to get all the achievements myself.

Based on the way I play games I usually play them to 1000 if I really like them so I'd probably go the 50,000 account.

That said I don't just play games for achievements as can be witnessed by me still playing games such as assassin's creed where I already have 100% completion :) I also don't buy DLC just because I want to get 100% achievements :)

[Panda]

I don't really care for completion but I do when I miss out on story achievements. Like, if I rented/bought a game; I'd like to have finished the story before I gave it back not just go for the easy achievements and get a large gs in it.

If you know what I mean?

[Cilantro Cortez]

Completion. 50k

[harry]

100k any day!

[Thegreatest7884]

I dont really care about completion, so I'd take the 100,000 gamerscore.

[Pirate]

I'd take the 50k because like JVViz, I too have OCD :p

[Dillagence]

50,000, 100% completion is pretty impressive especially if there are hard or time consuming games on there. It would also be difficult to keep a 100% completion percentage unless you played it safe with easy or boostable games. So with that said 50k for the win.

[Elod]

I take 50k. That game list could look much nicer, not a mess.

[B A R 4 D]

thats a good question..I'd personally go with the 50K with all 1000G's on all games :) that'd be goood..:woop:

[Madhatters13]

I'd go for the 100K as it would be pretty hard to keep the 100% record and it would just mess the 50K profile up. My completion % doesn't really bother me, as long as I get a decent amount of Gs in my games I'm happy. :)

[Double O Slevin]

I presonally would like the 50K, full 1000G's. I don't consider myself a completionist, but it would be nice to look and see that you've left no stone unturned for every game you've played.